Basava Premanand Dies – Deathbed Declaration

Basava Premanand Dies – Deathbed Declaration

Helena Petrovna Blavatsky:
“Science regards man as an aggregation of atoms temporarily united by a mysterious force called the life-principle. To the materialist the only difference between a living and a dead body is, that in the one case that force is active, in the other latent. When it is extinct or entirely latent, the molecules obey a superior attraction, which draws them asunder and scatters them through space. This dispersion must be death, if it is possible to conceive such a thing as death where the very molecules of the dead body manifest an intense vital energy.”

Basava Premanand (a vocal atheist, rationalist, skeptic and caustic critic of Sathya Sai Baba), died of cancer on October 4th 2009 at the Abhirami Hospital in Coimbatore, South India. He was 80 years old.

On the nirmukta.com domain, the following text was published and released by Narendra Nayak as Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License (which allows this blog to reproduce text and relevant images) under the title Premanand in Abhirami Hospital, Coimbatore:

Attribution Noncommercial License For B Premanand Article

Attribution Noncommercial License For B Premanand Article

Narendra Nayak:
Premanand’s health has been failing for quite some time. The metastases from his carcinoma of the stomach had been growing for quite some time and it was only a matter time before his health was seriously affected. Last week this happened and he had to be hospitalized. All his vital organs have been affected, particularly the liver and kidneys. However, his brain and his ideology are still intact and we wanted the world to know about it and make a declaration on his behalf that it remains so.

So, Somu and I went to Podanur on the 20th September and then on to the Abirami hospital where he had been admitted. He was quite drowsy and not responding to queries until I told him that there was a rumour that he has started believing in god and supernatural powers. He opened his eyes and said who says that? And that was the clear indication that however ill he may be, he continues to hold on to his convictions! He said that is nonsense. So, I told him that we should say so to the world and he agreed. The statement reproduced herein was put for his signature. But, his hands were weak and hence we had to take his thumb impression too. The declaration has been witnessed by Dr. Maya Prabhu his sister and Suneera one of his admirers who has been taking care of him.

Our movement is not based on individuals but those who are in the forefront are ever in the public eye and particularly in sights of those who want to attack us. They would like to spread rumors that eminent rationalists have changed on their death bed, have gone back to god and spiritualism etc. We do not want to give any occasion for such rumors and hence though it may sound morbid I had to complete his task. I would like the same to be done to me when I am on my death bed so that all can know that we hold on to our convictions whatever the circumstances may be.

This short report is a bulletin on the health of one of those who have inspired a whole generation and have done significant work to build up the movement. As and when news is received I shall make more such communications.

TO WHOMEVER IT MAY CONCERN

Declaration of attitude and temperament

I, B. Premanand s/o late Sri Basava Prabhu, 80 years of age resident Chettipalayam Road, Podanur, sound of mind though suffering from physical complications caused by metastases in many organs caused by carcinoma of the stomach herein solemnly wish to place on record the following:

I have been closely associated with the rationalist movement from 1975 onwards and have been a rationalist of full conviction since then and continue to be so.

It is common for the purveyors of superstitions and such anti rational forces to start spreading rumors about rationalists turning to god and other supernatural forces at the end of their lives and becoming devotees of gods and god men of various types.

It is also claimed that at times of crises that we staunch rationalists through the major part of our lives, turn to spiritualism and religion.

I wish to clarify that as on today the twentieth of September, 2009 I remain a staunch rationalist and wish to place on record the following:

  1. I continue to be a rationalist of full conviction.
  2. I do not believe in any supernatural power. All the powers that we encounter are in the realm of nature and nothing exists beyond that.
  3. I do not believe in the existence of the soul or rebirth.
  4. I have not turned to any religion, god or any sort of spiritual pursuits.
  5. When I pass away I shall be leaving only my body which is to be donated to a medical college and no spirit or soul to cause problems for the living.

I want to convey to all that the struggle against the exploitation by god men and so called supernatural forces is a long and hard one but the ultimate victory will be ours.

My very survival has been a challenge to astrologers and their so called “science” of astrology, as they had all predicted that I would die soon after birth and refused to cast a horoscope for me.

I wish to convey to my colleagues of the rationalist movement to continue the work that I have been doing with renewed vigor and that will be the best of tributes for me.

Abhirami Hospital
Podanur
(B. Premanand)
Witnessed by: Dr. Maya Prabhu and Suneera

Observations About Premanand’s “Deathbed Declaration”:

Basava Premanand On September 20th 2009

Basava Premanand On September 20th 2009


First and foremost, the “deathbed declaration” attributed to Basava Premanand was NOT authored by him. The “deathbed declaration” was written for Premanand by Indian Rationalists who got him to scribble his signature on it when he was:

  1. Actively dying of metastasized cancer.
  2. Drifting in and out of consciousness.
  3. Barely able to speak.
  4. In a hospital.
  5. Jaundiced.
  6. Unable to write due to weakness.
  7. Too weak to sit up in bed.
  8. “On his deathbed” (as described by nirmukta.com).

Consequently, Basava Premanand was not “sound of mind” on September 20th 2009 when he scribbled his signature on the “deathbed declaration” (which he did not author as falsely stated in the letter). Basava Premanand’s signature was obtained with assistance and the signature was so illegible, a thumbprint had to be used. It is also significant to note that Basava Premanand had very poor vision and could not read without his glasses on. Premanand scribbled on the letter without his glasses and did not look at the place where he was signing (as confirmed by the picture above), which resulted in a completely illegible “signature” (see enlarged signature below):

Deceptive Basava Premanand Deathbed Declaration

Deceptive Basava Premanand Deathbed Declaration


Did Basava Premanand’s Stomach Cancer Spread To His Brain?
Nirmukta Interview With Premanand January 2009

Nirmukta Interview With Premanand January 2009


In an interview between Narenda Nayak and Basava Premanand in January 2009, Premanand said “I am not able to think and put my thoughts in writing as I am feeling some difficulty in that.” Needless to say, stomach cancer by itself does not affect one’s ability to “think” or “write”. The only time stomach cancer would affect one’s ability to “think” or “write” is when it has spread (metastasized) to the brain. Nirmukta.com published that Basava Premanand’s cancer had metastasized (spread to other parts of his body) and the “deathbed declaration” similary stated there were “metastases in many organs”. Basava Premanand himself stated in January 2009 (eight months before the dubiously penned “deathbed declaration”) that he was not able to put his thoughts into writing (which strongly suggests brain metastases). Consequently, how exactly did Basava Premanand write a deathbed declaration claiming he was “sound of mind” when he was unable to put his thoughts into writing since January 2009?

What motive could there possibly be behind the dubiously penned “deathbed declaration” that was drafted by Indian Rationalists and presented to Basava Premanand when he was actively dying and drifting in and out of consciousness?

Basava Premanand’s Ties To Psychic Medium Conny Larsson:

It would appear that Indian Rationalists attempted to counter information that strongly suggests Basava Premanand may have entertained beliefs in the paranormal.

It is an irrefutable fact that Basava Premanand published an Anti-Sai-Baba book in 2005 for Psychic Medium & Trance Channeler Conny Larsson entitled “Behind The Mask Of The Clown”. Basava Premanand even published material about Conny Larsson in his Indian Skeptic magazine (Reference) and sent copies of Conny Larsson’s book to various high-ranking Indian officials and his rationalist subscribers (as he did with other books criticizing Sathya Sai Baba).

Ex-Devotees State Basava Premanand Published Conny Larssons Book

Ex-Devotees State Basava Premanand Published Conny Larsson’s Book


Even Ex-Devotee’s solicited Psychic Medium Conny Larsson’s book, which was published by Basava Premanand. About Conny Larsson’s book, the screencap above states: “Available from B. Premanand 11/7. Chettipalayam Road. Podnadur -641 023. Tamil Nadu (India) SS$18. -Euro 15. -Sterling 11 – free postage.”

The Indian Sceptic confirmed that Basava Premanand published Conny Larsson’s book:

Indian Sceptic: “Behind the Mask of the Clown, published by B Premanand in English, is available from The Garden Bookshop, Ozankoy, and the news agent’s at the top of Girne high street at a cost of 20YTL.” (Indian Sceptic Reference)

After defecting from the Sathya Sai Baba movement in 1999, Conny Larsson quickly began soliciting himself as a Meditation Guru, Vedic Master and Mantra Initiator. By the years 2003 – 2004, Conny Larsson started peddling himself as a New Age Guru, Trance Channel, Spirit Medium, Séance Conductor, Crystal Power Promoter, Aura Cleanser, Chakra Aligner and self-professed Prophet and channel for the spirit of Maharishi Vyasa. Conny Larsson also associates himself with other Psychics, Channelers, Mediums, Angel Visionaries, Guru Devotees and New Age Healers on his official domains: vedicmasterclass.org and heartandsoulexpo.com.

Basava Premanand (who claimed he thoroughly researched his output) published an Anti-Sai-Baba book for Conny Larsson, a self-professed Psychic Medium. Basava Premanand believed in, endorsed, published and widely solicited Conny Larsson’s Anti-Sai-Baba book. Isn’t it strange that a skeptic and atheist would vouch for the integrity, honesty and credibility of a man who claimed to be a psychic trance medium?

Gerald Joe Moreno sent the Indian Sceptic an email on Sep 24, 2008 with a link to his article entitled Basava Premanand Endorses Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson. It is interesting to note:

  1. Basava Premanand never once criticized Psychic Medium Conny Larsson.
  2. Basava Premanand never once made any type of retractions about Psychic Medium Conny Larsson.
  3. Basava Premanand never once discussed why he published a book for a self-professed psychic medium.
  4. Basava Premanand adamantly refused to denounce Conny Larsson as a fraud.
  5. To Date: Not even one of Basava Premanand’s atheist, skeptic or rationalist associates has come forward to denounce Psychic Medium Conny Larsson (strongly suggesting a cover-up). What do Premanand’s associates have to hide?

Therefore, it would appear that Basava Premanand may have entertained beliefs in the paranormal abilities of alleged psychic mediums and trance channelers like Conny Larsson. Shocking!

Perhaps Indian Rationalists can get Psychic Medium Conny Larsson to “channel” the spirit of Basava Premanand for them? After all, Basava Premanand was willing to put his reputation on the line to support Multi-Millionaire Conny Larsson’s alleged integrity and credibility. Why are Basava Premanand’s atheist, skeptic and rationalist associates mum & playing dumb on this issue?

The God Beyond The Head

Sathya Sai Baba - Heart To Heart

Sathya Sai Baba - Heart To Heart


The God Beyond The Head

Loving Sai Ram and greetings from Prashanti Nilayam.

Here in Prashanti, it is quite common to see many people sitting in the veranda reading books, while waiting for Sathya Sai Baba to come out for Darshan. These days, many of the books that devotees are reading deal with Science and God. By and large, these books appear to examine whether or not God exists, through the “scientific route,” if we might call it that. Some of the books are by theologians, while others are by scientists. Where the latter are concerned, the question seems to be: “Looking at the physical Universe as it has evolved and as it is today, is there any evidence to suggest that it was created by a God beyond the Universe?”

The question as well as the approach of exploration is nothing new. From very ancient times, people have repeatedly been asking: “Wherefrom did the Universe come, and was there a Supreme Creator who actually willed it and brought it into existence?” Given the intrinsic doubting nature of humans, we suppose this question would remain for ever, at least as long the human race exists.

Now why did we bring all this up? For a good reason; we wish to discuss today the question: “How does one think of God, what does one believe about God and how exactly must one relate to God?” Actually, we have nothing original to say on the subject because all that needs to be said has already said by Sathya Sai Baba; what we intend to do is just to pull together the various pieces and offer them as one integrated piece.

We would like to start by reminding ourselves that the human being is actually a composite of three entities: The gross body, the subtle Mind and the even subtler Heart. Of these, the Heart is the seat of feeling; the Mind is the vehicle for generating thoughts while the body is the engine of action. Generally speaking, action is preceded by thoughts, which are in turn triggered by feelings – in other words, the hierarchy is, Heart first, Mind next, the senses and the body last. Here is an example that illustrates the point.

You are walking along the road and you see an old hungry lady begging for food. That sight fills your Heart with sadness and compassion. That feeling makes your Mind think: “I have with me here in a bag that I am carrying, some bread. Why not I give this lady a part of that loaf?” That is the thought that arises in your Mind. The thought then triggers action. You go near the old woman, stop, smile, take out some bread, give it to her and say, “Mother, please accept this food as a gift from God. Hope you would like it,” or something like that.

You may say, “All this is fine but how does it relate to the title of this article?” Ah, that exactly is what we are coming to! Let us go back to the example just given and ask: “What if the Heart did not ooze with compassion, at the sight of the old and hungry lady?” You might have just walked away without paying any attention.

The difference between actions shaped entirely by the “Head” and those triggered by the “Heart” were beautifully brought out by Jesus a long time ago, through his famous parable of the Good Samaritan. We have referred to this story any number of times in the past but it is necessary to recall it briefly one more time, in order to place it in the present context. In that story, there is a man who has been waylaid by robbers, ripped of all his possessions, beaten black and blue, and left helpless by the side of a desert track. Two people pass by, one after the other, a Levite and a priest. Both take a look at the man and pass on. Why? Was it not obvious to them that the poor man needed urgent help? Perhaps in a vague way it was. Even as they were possibly wondering what they ought to do, the Head, we are sure, must have intervened and said, “Listen, you want to help that man? But what’s there in it for you? Move on.”

If we analyse carefully we would find that most of the time when people switch off when assistance or help is desperately needed is because of the question: “What’s there in it for me?” Given human nature, this question is inevitable; it would always arise. If that be the case, does it mean that one would always come to the conclusion, “No, there is nothing in it for me,” and walk away as the priest and the Levite did? How then does one explain the behaviour of the Good Samaritan, whose example Jesus holds out for us? What was there in it for him? That really is the point of our discussion today.

You see, the question that we referred to does indeed arise often. And every time the question is asked [the question, by the way, is always asked by the “Head”], there sure is an answer. However, there are two sources for the answer – the Head, and the Heart. In the case of the Levite and the priest, it was the Head that answered. It simply said, “Move on buddy, there is nothing in it for you.” In the case of the Good Samaritan, the answer came from the Heart, which said, “Look at that poor fellow. He desperately needs your help. Go and do something for him, whatever you can.”

This then tells us, that two voices can and do speak from within, each with its own perspective. One voice is that of the “Head” and the other is from the “Heart”. The question now arises: “What is the difference, and how do we distinguish between the two?” The answer has been given by Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. He says the voice of the Head is really the voice of the lower self or the ego. And the voice from the Heart? That is the Voice of the True Higher Self, the Indweller, the Voice of God. As for the difference, the Head will generally offer many options and argue: “Listen, this option means these advantages for you. That option means those advantages and disadvantages for you. Choose this one, because this means least trouble for you and indeed a lot of gain.” In other words, the language of the Head is the language of business, of profit and loss, of advantages and disadvantages, in short, the language of selfishness. As for the Heart, it never offers multiple choices. God the Resident of the Heart, is One. He is Truth, and Truth as Sathya Sai Baba often reminds us, is always one, not two. In practical terms, the Heart will always give only one option, that option being what God would like us to do.

To sum up this part of the discussion, we note the following important points:

  • The Head is not everything.
  • The Head always offers many options and argues which is most advantageous and so forth.
  • The options of the Head are inevitably tinged with selfishness, sometimes in the extreme.
  • The options of the Head might seem very rational from a worldly point of view but one must not be fooled.
  • They all arise from the Ego, must be carefully avoided.
  • As for the Heart, it never speaks with a “forked tongue”.
  • It gives only one option, always, because Truth is one and not two.
  • The course of action indicated by the Heart is always free from selfishness because its source is God.

In fact, “the selfishness test” is the best way of checking out whether the voice we hear from within is from the Head or from the Heart.

Getting back to the point we started with, we would at this point like to say that to us at least, it seems meaningless to discover God through the route of Science. Such explorations might be intellectually very challenging and even stimulating but at the end of the day, we wonder about their utility. What we mean is the following: OK, through Science we “prove” there is a God. What next? Do we raise yet another question, start yet another inquiry and write more books?

In our view, all this is a complete waste of time. Gandhi told the western world way back in 1931, “He is no God who merely satisfies the intellect. God to be God must rule the Heart and transform the senses. He is LOVE.” That is what we find in the case of the Good Samaritan. God ruled his Heart and his actions bear testimony to that. This leads us to the important point that it does not make sense to “discover” the existence of God via Science. Such an exercise depends on the “Head” and, as Gandhi has pointed out, this is a futile way of trying to find out whether God exists or not.

We must not try to “understand” God as some are trying to do but EXPERIENCE God. How does one do that? Sathya Sai Baba has given the answer. He says Bliss is Union with God. This implies that experiencing Bliss is the best way to experience God. The question now arises: “What is this Bliss? How is it different from pleasure, that one gets say from gambling?” The answer is simple and once again is available from Sathya Sai Baba. When we talk of joy, happiness etc., we invariably mean pleasure that we get out worldly experiences, experiences that gratify the senses in some manner or the other. These “joyful” experiences [like the “good feeling” one supposedly gets by drinking alcohol say] belong to the dual world and therefore have an opposite. As Satya Sai Baba reminds us so often, pleasure is an interval between two pains. Further, let us say a person enjoys a cone of ice-cream. One year later when he recalls that event, it remains a mere recollection. There is no particular joy in the recollection. On the other hand, let us consider an Interview that Swami has given us. During the Interview of course we are all in a state of Bliss; it cannot be any other way. Ten years later when we recall, we still feel a lot of exhilaration. That is an important quality of Bliss. Also, it has no opposite, since Bliss belongs to the non-dual realm of God.

So, experiencing Bliss is what experiencing God is all about. There are many ways of experiencing such Bliss. Listening to stories of the Lord is one; listening to songs in praise of the Lord is another; singing Sai Bhajans with feeling is yet another; and so on the list goes. We submit, as Sathya SaiBaba has often told us, serving others with Selfless Love is the simplest and most practical way of experiencing Bliss. That is exactly how one can understand the behaviour of the Good Samaritan. The Head asked the question: “What is there in it for me?” And the Heart answered, “There is Bliss; don’t miss the chance; experience Bliss through service and be with God at least for some time.”

To wrap it all up, we submit that trying to reason out the existence of God may be intellectually stimulating and satisfying but at the end of the day, it merely amounts to what Swami refers to as Bookish Knowledge. On the other hand, spontaneously responding to distress and reaching out to help results in Bliss, and constitutes, in Sathya Sai Baba’s language, Practical Knowledge. If we are interested in joy, pleasure or “kicks” to use a popular slang, the Head is the best agent. But if we want Bliss, then the Heart is the unfailing guide.

In a sense thus, life is constantly offering us a choice between pleasure and Bliss. If we want pleasure, the Head would show the way, but if we prefer Bliss, then we must look beyond the Head, for that is where God is.

Have you noticed that Spirituality is not something hairy-fairy but very practical? That is why Swami refers to Spirituality as Practical Knowledge. Swami does not want us to withdraw from or to run away from the world into seclusion. He wants us to be very much in it, but conduct our lives using the Heart as a compass rather than the Head.

There is a lot that needs to be said on this subject but we shall deal with that later. For the moment, we take your leave. Till we get together again.

Jai Sai Ram.

With Love and Regards,
“Heart2Heart” Team.

Irrational Rationalists

Sathya Sai Baba

Sathya Sai Baba


Irrational Rationalists

Loving Sai Ram and greetings from Prashanti Nilayam. Last week, we commented upon Sathya Sai Baba‘s Hospitals and what a mighty contrast they offer to most of the other hospitals in India. Yet, very few people know about the wonders that Sathya Sai Baba’s Hospitals are. Such ignorance about Sathya Sai Baba and His glorious missions is widespread, and to make our point, this week we shall start with a quote from a well-known social activist and a self-confessed rationalist. This is what he wrote recently in leading national daily. The article was all about what the writer calls ‘godmen’, and in a thinly veiled reference to Satya Sai Baba, the writer says:

At the top of this is a godman, who counts ex-Presidents and Prime Ministers among his disciples. The cabal running his trust boasts of top-level IAS officers (retired but active). It has former Directors-General of Police too. Rather ugly charges been brought in foreign courts against their leader. But media scrutiny of it all is weak.

Actually, the writer starts off on a real nasty note but we have refrained from quoting that obnoxious sentence in order to spare anguish and pain to you, our dear Subscriber.

The world, as we all know, is a mixture of good and bad; this is unavoidable since the world, as Swami often reminds us, is a mere reflection of our inside. If good and evil co-exist outside, it is because good and evil co-exist inside. Swami’s Spiritual Mission, which this writer contemptuously dismisses, as a unit of ‘massive spiritual industry’, is really an attempt to help man to sort out himself and to transform internally, so that Society as a whole changes for the better. Before we come to the philosophical aspects, we would like to raise a few practical points.

The writer in question is critical of Sathya Sai Baba. There are of courses, Gurus and Gurus; some who are well meaning and do a lot of good to Society, each in their own way, and others who are charlatans and hoodwink Society in order to make a fast buck. Just because there are many quacks, can one damn the entire medical profession? Recently, it was discovered that a certain group of scientists had faked results and published a paper with supposedly epoch making results. Later the fraud was discovered, and the scientists concerned had to suffer public humiliation. Now just because there are the occasional frauds, is it fair to damn all scientists everywhere? Yet, our rationalist friends are quick to damn those they despise, without even bothering to look at the facts.

Just consider the case of the writer whom we have quoted. He is unhappy because Indian Media generally glorify Gurus and do not critically examine and expose; and in this broad-brush attack, he includes Sathya Sai Baba also. This seems to indicate that the writer has already judged and sentenced; only, he wants the Media to proclaim to the world, his verdict. Is this being rational and objective? Has the writer in question made any effort to know anything at all about Swami’s Hospitals that we wrote about last week? Dr. Hegde, Senior Neuro-Surgeon in the Bangalore Super Speciality Hospital, came there after many years of experience elsewhere and an enviable professional reputation as well as a distinguished track record. With all his credentials, Dr. Hegde can command any salary he wants in any commercial hospital. Yet, he has chosen to willingly forgo all that and work in Sathya Sai Baba’s Hospital. Do you know why? Because here, he can serve the poorest of the poor, as he himself has openly declared. If this is a part of Sathya Sai Baba’s ‘industry’, pray what is wrong with it?

Leave aside the Hospitals, wonders though they are. Let us turn to what Swami has done by way of providing safe drinking water to millions. Is this writer who is so quick to damn and quote so-called court cases abroad, aware that how much Swami has done to bring safe drinking water to thirsty people, especially in villages? Here are some statistics: Swami’s Trust spent $70 million for the Anantapur Water Project alone. About $180 million is the total amount of money spent by Baba’s Trusts in all Water Projects. Not only that; the entire water works was gifted away to the people of Andhra Pradesh. Sathya Sai Baba did not take one cent. Speaking on that occasion, Mr. Chandra Babu Naidu, then Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh said that Swami, out of compassion for poor villagers, had done what the Central and the State Governments ought to have.

The Anantapur project was just the beginning, and since then Swami has done many others; we will not tax you with details here; they can be easily found in Heart 2 Heart. We would just like to make a few simple points:

  1. In about a decade, Sathya Sai Baba’s drinking water projects have enabled about ten million people in various places, including about 7.5 million in Madras/Chennai, to get safe drinking water.
  2. Sathya Sai Baba’s Trust has spent about $180 millions for all this, but the Trust has not collected one single cent in return. For Sathya Sai Baba, the fact that He made millions happy was enough.

Take the dimension of Seva, which goes on non-stop from Fiji to Peru and everywhere in between. Few have any idea of how much Seva, devotees of Sathya Sai Baba quietly do all the time. The writer in question has made sarcastic comments about a certain godman who went to visit the tsunami relief sites but beat a hasty retreat along with his huge retinue of cars, when he heard a rumour that another tsunami was on the way. Does this writer know that when corpses in their hundreds lay scattered all across the beaches of South India and when the members of the Civil Administration and the Police refused to pick them up and remove them, it was Sathya Sai Baba’s Seva Dals who took tetanus shots and dared to remove them? In fact, Sathya Sai Baba’s devotees rushed to help not only in India but also in Indonesia, Thailand and Sri Lanka. All this is well documented in a special issue of Heart 2 Heart, in great detail we might add.

Rationalists live trapped in the world of the ‘Head’ because for them anything beyond is irrational. Yet, in the State of West Bengal, ruled by ‘Left-led rationalist movement’ as our writer describes them, when there is dirty work to be done, who is it that is called? Sathya Sai Baba’s Seva Dals. Just to give an example, every year at the festival of Ganga Sagar, which occurs in mid-January, a million pilgrims come for a holy dip to the spot where Ganges merges with the sea. On that occasion, large stretches of the beach become toilets; and who cleans the beach? Sathya Sai Baba’s Seva Dals! The list goes on.

Objectively speaking, God-denying rationalists are more to be pitied than censured. For instance, the writer whose remarks have triggered this ‘Sunday Special’ is personally a committed social activist helping with many humanitarian causes. That he feels for the suffering of the poor cannot be denied. The tragedy, however, is that ‘rationalists,’ do not readily accept that qualities like Love, compassion, forbearance etc., are Divine in origin and flow from the Heart.

If we analyse carefully, most of the problems that humanity faces today are caused by the ‘Head’. And most of the time, experts try to produce solutions for these problems from that very same ‘Head’! That sort of approach can never work, when the problems are created by envy, jealousy, hatred etc. Problems produced by the evil tendencies lurking within humans can be solved only by the Heart.

Rationalists, trapped as they are in world of the ‘Head’, and refusing as they do to look at the dimensions beyond, are like the people who believe in the Flat Earth hypothesis. We can certainly pretend the earth is flat on scales like a football field and may be on slightly larger scales too. But on the scale of the solar system, the earth is certainly not flat.

God is for all, and everyone needs Spirituality, whether our writer accepts it or not. Thus, one must not complain if so-called VIPs come to Sathya Sai Baba; so do millions of others, all the way from a cook in Montana to a school-teacher from New Zealand. Somehow, the writer seems to focus only on the VIPs and imagine that to be a minus mark for Sathya Sai Baba!

The reason why we raised this topic is because many devotees write to us expressing concern about the innumerable negative comments aired all the time by these so-called rationalists, most of who do not even follow the elementary rule of checking on facts before commenting adversely. They passionately believe in the truth of their assertions because their views are based on those of other ‘rationalists’. Is that being rational? We wonder!

Thank you and Jai Sai Ram.

With Love and Regards,
“Heart2Heart”
RadioSai’s e-Journal Team,
In Sai Service.