RFJ van der Sandt – ExBaba Webmaster – Illegally Steals The Entire SaiSathyaSai.com Domain

RFJ van der Sandt – ExBaba Webmaster – Illegally Steals The Entire SaiSathyaSai.com Domain

Reinier van der Sandt (an Anti-Sai Activist, notorious defamer and webmaster to the largest Anti-Baba websites on the world-wide-web) was caught red-handed illegally stealing Gerald Joe Moreno’s entire Pro-Sathya-Sai-Baba website saisathyasai.com and published its full contents on the “Ex-Baba” domain.

Gerald Joe Moreno promptly reported RFJ Sandt’s blatant act of copyright infringement to his DDS.NL hosting company and Sandt’s entire Ex-Baba domain was shut down until Reinier van der Sandt removed the offending material (which he eventually did). See the following screencaps for relevant information:

Google Results Showing R.F.J van der Sandt’s Theft Of SaiSathyaSai.com Property
(click thumbnail to enlarge)

Google Results Showing The Theft Of The SaiSathyaSai Website By Reinier van der Sandt

Google Results Showing The Theft Of The SaiSathyaSai Website By Reinier van der Sandt

Pirated SaiSathyaSai Files On The RFJ van der Sandt ExBaba Domain
(click thumbnail to enlarge)

RFJ van der Sandt Domain Showing Stolen Files And Folders

RFJ van der Sandt Domain Showing Stolen Files And Folders

DDS.NL Shut Down The Entire ExBaba Domain For Copyright Infringement
(click thumbnail to enlarge)

DDS Shut Down The Entire RFJ Sandt Domain Until All Moreno Files Were Removed

DDS Shut Down The Entire RFJ Sandt Domain Until All Moreno Files Were Removed

DDS Email Acknowledging That RFJ van der Sandt Removed The Offending Material
(click thumbnail to enlarge)

DDS Email Acknowledging Abuse By RFJ van der Sandt

DDS Email Acknowledging Abuse By RFJ van der Sandt


Reinier van der Sandt is the same hypocrite who blathers extensively about “copyright infringement” on his Anti-Baba website and is the same person who admitted viewing illegal child pornography and who admitted that settingcaptivesfree.com helped him to overcome (allegedly) his pornography addiction (Reference). RFJ Sandt is also a staunch friend, ally, supporter and associate of the Sai Baba defamers Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy. One can be certain that pseudo-moralists Barry Pittard & Robert Priddy (who even uses the internet nic “Moral Agent”) will ignore and dismiss Reinier van der Sandt’s shameless behaviors (although they ceaselessly posture themselves as moral authorities dedicated to the truth)!

MAJOR UPDATE: April 2nd 2010: Just one day after the DDS.NL hosting company shut down Reinier van der Sandt’s ExBaba domain for copyright infringement, RFJ Sandt removed the entire rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba domain and redirected it to a new domain at 213.10.134.161/rvdsandt/ex-baba/, which is hosted by KPN (formerly known as planet.nl).

MAJOR UPDATE: April 6th 2010: Reinier van der Sandt reactivated the rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba domain, minus the stolen content from saisathyasai.com.

What Every Sathya Sai Devotee Needs To Know About Reinier Van Der Sandt – The ExBaba Webmaster

What Every Sathya Sai Devotee Needs To Know About Reinier Van Der Sandt – The ExBaba Webmaster

This article will cover the following topics:

  • RFJ van der Sandt – A Fundamentalist Christian?
  • Posts By Reinier Van Der Sandt On The PvdA Amsterdam Forum
  • RFJ Sandt And The Setting Captives Free Website
  • Reinier Van Der Sandt Refuses To Deny He Is A Christian
  • RFJ Sandt Posted A Christian Banner On The ExBaba Domain
  • R.F.J. Sandt Defended A Convicted Christian Sex Offender
  • Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Admission To Viewing Child Pornography
  • Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Numerous Fake Names
  • Reinier Van Der Sandt – The ExBaba Webmaster – In Conclusion

Continue reading

More Proof That Critics Of Sai Baba Are Liars And Deceivers

More Proof That Critics Of Sai Baba Are Liars And Deceivers

Reinier Van Der Sandt, the webmaster for the largest Anti-Sai website on the world-wide-web (ExBaba.com), recently created an Anti-Sai WordPress blog in which he solicitied an image of Sathya Sai Baba as an authentic picture of a “demon”. The following screencap shows the relevant extract (click to enlarge):

Fraudulent And Altered Picture Of Sathya Sai Baba

Fraudulent And Altered Picture Of Sathya Sai Baba


RFJ Sandt: 1) Has a known history of creating and distorting images against Sai Baba (Ref); 2) Confessed to using numerous fake online identities (Ref); 3) Believes that it is OKAY to visit child-pornography websites as long as one is “not a customer”, even admitting that he visited “lots of kiddie porno websites” (Ref); and 4) Repeatedly claims that Sathya Sai Baba is engaging in questionable sexual acts in full view of thousands of devotees while being recorded on video. For example, see the edited Ex-Baba movie clip entitled Sai Baba Groin (approximately 950kb, wmv file).

The picture duplicated on RFJ Sandt’s ExBabaBlog was actually stolen from the SaiBabaOfIndia website (which is not affiliated with the Sai Organization) and was purposely and maliciously distorted. View The Original Picture Here.

Original Picture That Was Distorted By A Critic Of Sai Baba

Original Picture That Was Distorted By A Critic Of Sai Baba


Image Shack Pictures Linked Directly To The ExBaba Admin:

The following image shows two versions to the same picture of Sathya Sai Baba. The picture on the left was taken from ImageShack (attributed to an anonymous person) and the picture on the right was taken from Reinier van der Sandt’s blog (an image he created himself):

Image Shack On Left - Reinier Van Der Sandt’s On Right

Image Shack On Left - Reinier Van Der Sandt’s On Right


As one can see, the style used to post defamatory comments against Sathya Sai Baba is the same. The same font was used. The same white box in the upper left hand corner was used. The same sexually-twisted interpretations were given. Therefore, one can only logically conclude that Reinier Van Der Sandt was the person who created both images, one under the guise of anonymity.

More Sexually Twisted Images Posted By Reinier Van Der Sandt:

Reinier’s Picture Entitled ‘How Close Do They Get’

Reinier’s Picture Entitled ‘How Close Do They Get’

Image Shack Picture On Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Domain

Image Shack Picture On Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Domain Saying ‘But when sai is with girls he keep distance’


In Conclusion:

Needless to say, Critics of Sathya Sai Baba are dishonest and bitter individuals who have been fully exposed by Joe Moreno on his saisathyasai.com domain to be pathological liars, mentally unstable defamers and sexual deviants (fully documented with links, screen-caps and verifiable references).

Critics try very hard to con the general public into thinking they are honest, reliable, non-vindictive and moral individuals not given to slurring, defamations, ridicule, prevarication or deception. Needless to say, the facts prove that critics are gutter individuals who have zero crediblity and zero integrity. Therefore, why should anyone give credence to their unsubstantiated and unsupported accusations against Sri Sathya Sai Baba, who has never (ever) been charged with any crime?

The truth is finally being made known and thank goodness for that!

ExBaba Webmaster – Reinier Van Der Sandt – Hijacks Sathya Sai Baba Website

ExBaba Webmaster – Reinier Van Der Sandt – Hijacks Sathya Sai Baba Website

The ExBaba Admin stole the complete template, content, text and pictures to the former Puttaparthi.com website and duplicated it on his Anti-Baba domain. The following screencap shows the brazen act of theft and how the ExBaba Admin even put a black bar across Sathya Sai Baba’s eyes (because he believes that Baba’s eyes radiate energy through them). The rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba domain is Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Anti-Sai domain. These are the types of plagiarists, con-men and thieves who resort to subterfuge and deceit to attack Sathya Sai Baba and to lure unsuspecting Sai Devotees to their hate-filled sites:

http://www.rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/puttaparthi_bestanden/news.html
http://www.rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/puttaparthi_bestanden/index.htm
http://www.rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/puttaparthi_bestanden/events.htm
http://www.rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/puttaparthi_bestanden/thoughts.htm
http://www.rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/puttaparthi_bestanden/newsletter.htm
http://www.rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/puttaparthi_bestanden/contactus.htm

Sathya Sai Baba Template Stolen By ExBaba Domain

Sathya Sai Baba Template Stolen By ExBaba Domain

22 Sai Students Respond To The Allegations Against Sathya Sai Baba

Swami Sai Baba

Swami Sai Baba

Twenty Two Sai Students Respond To The Allegations Against Sathya Sai Baba
An Amazing Set Of Emails Suppressed On The English ExBaba Domain

» Sai Students Menu (click on a link to go to relevant section):

» Introduction: TOP
Just recently, Lisa DeWitt found a webpage on the Dutch ExBaba domain whose contents were never divulged on the English ExBaba domain. The ExBaba webmaster (Reinier Van Der Sandt) purchased access to the alumni.net website and obtained a list of 206 names and emails of Sathya Sai Students attending the Sri Sathya Sai Higher Secondary School and the Sri Sathya Sai Institute Of Higher Learning (both in Puttaparthi, India).

These emails were personally obtained from Sai Students by Reinier Van Der Sandt (a fierce and relentless critic of Sathya Sai Baba) and he published them in March 2001. Therefore, the integrity of these emails are vouched for by an Anti-Sai Activist himself. The ExBaba webmaster emailed 206 Sai Students (promising them confidentiality) hoping to get an admission of, or knowledge about, sexual abuse allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. What he received were 22 emails from Sai Students (many attending Baba’s schools for many years) where all of them (without exception) denied the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba and related positive encounters and experiences with him.

These emails wholly refute the numerous claims (made by Anti-Sai Activists) that Sai Students are all aware of Sathya Sai Baba’s alleged sexual behaviors among themselves and that they are imprisoned, isolated, desperate for help, etc. It is also important to point out that many of these Sai Students had graduated and were not living at Baba’s Ashram when they received Reinier’s email. Therefore, they had nothing to hide and were at liberty to say whatever they wanted.

This purposely suppressed webpage also provided a source (i.e., alumni.net) where a list of 155 Sai Student Names could have been obtained. In September 2001, on several Anti-Sai forums and sites, an anonymous person using the name “Ex-Sai Student” (since exposed as “UsedByBaba“) posted a list of 155 Sai Student names and claimed that all of them were sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba. In the past 5 years, not even one Anti-Sai Activist, Anti-Sai Media or Anti-Sai Rationalist has been able to confirm even one single case of sexual abuse from any Sai Student in the list of 155 names (or anywhere else, for that matter).

Reinier Van Der Sandt attempted to equate a “no response” (to his email inquiries) with a “hesitatation to respond because of an other reason” (implying that Sai Students were hesitant to respond because they were sexually abused). Since Reinier (the ExBaba webmaster) believed this (as evidenced on Email 10) it is entirely possible that the list of 155 Sai Student names was published in an attempt to force these Sai Students into giving some sort of confession. Needless to say, it didn’t work. This also shows to what extreme Anti-Sai Activists are willing to go to smear Sathya Sai Baba and his students when they don’t get a response to their vitriol and baseless accusations. Reinier relied on paranoia, speculation and presumption to base his belief that Sai Students were sexually abused.

» (Reinier Van Der Sandt) ExBaba Webmaster’s Email To Sai Students: TOP
Referenced from: rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/kortnieuws/uitslag.html

25 March 2001

Dear Student,

I am the webmaster of a Dutch site, that explores the activities of Sai Baba.

You are receiving this email, because I am deeply concerned about the complaints against Baba, I have heard, that Sai Baba, your Avatar, is sexually molesting students and other male devotees, is this true?

Would you be honest in telling me whether this really happens or not?

I understand that you might have trouble in telling me, because I am aware that these things cannot be written so easily, especially when you are (or were) a student in Prasanthi Nilayam.

There are a few questions I’d like to ask, maybe you have heard them spread by other people too, and they made you shiver, but please, I am very serious, I don’t have a sick mind in asking you this:

  1. Did you ever have an Interview with Baba?
  2. Did he put his arms around you, just as lovers use to do?
  3. Was there some kissing between you and Baba during this Interview?
  4. Did Baba ever rub oil into your genitals?
  5. Was there any kind of masturbation, and did you let him do this to you?
  6. Did you gratify him orally?
  7. Did you like what you were doing?
  8. Was he gratifying you?
  9. Did you like what he was doing, or not? Or did you think:
  10. That it was necessary to let him do this to you, claiming that it helped to release your sexual tension, or that it helped to give you some ‘Spiritual Cleaning’?
  11. Did Baba say not to mention anything to anyone about what had happened?
  12. Do you have friends who may have had these experiences?
  13. Have you ever heard of anyone, who has had such kind of treatment?

I should like to explain my modest point of view on these activities; even the slightest worse, putting his arms around you, or the kissing, is, in my opinion, not right, not even in India, not even done by Sai Baba in India. I can image that, in case of any disease, a doctor should investigate your genitals, but I think, all other cases in which this happens, are not ok.

Sexual activities like these, could be normal between lovers, these things may happen, but not when you are consulting Baba, in an so called Interview, where personal problems should be treated with, in your case, some extrasensory perception or some other form of New Age psychotherapy.

Let me play things open and explain what I am doing:

I have found four Baba schools on www.alumni.net, I am investigating two of them:

1. Sri Sathya Sai Higher Secondary School (21 addresses)

2. Sri Sathya Sai Institute Of Higher Learning (185 addresses, there are a few more, but the letter ’O’ on www.alumni.net didn’t work )

I have sent and email to all students, I received 22 answers, they were all very positive about Baba and his teachings and the general atmosphere in the Ashram, they are all convinced that there is no such thing as sexual abuse, my email bounced 4 times, means that I couldn’t reach four persons, so 184 students didn’t answer. 

I hope that you will decide to e-mail about it. In that regard I want to let you know that, if necessary, help is being offered to you. I know some people, one of them is a school psychologist, that are willing to write, phone, or e-mail with you to help in painful situations. 

Don’t be afraid, I won’t take advantage of your story, your email will be handled very discrete, and besides that, your name won’t ever be published, it is just that I’m trying to help, and to remind you, that all people in Holland are deeply concerned about your situation in the Ashram of Sai Baba in India.

Very, very nice greetings,

A Friend

XXX (Reinier Van Der Sandt)

» Sai Students Respond To The Allegations: TOP
The ExBaba Webmaster withheld the identities of these students (as he promised in his letter above). Reference to “XXX” refers to the ExBaba Webmaster (who withheld his name as well). These emails were obtained and published by a critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba. Consequently, the authenticity of these emails is vouched for by an Anti-Sai Activist himself:


» Email 01 TOP

Hi!

I’m sorry but all this information is false and so there is no evidence to give. I don’t know why you believe all this crap. You people have no shame. I’m an ex-student and so is my brother and we have gone through nothing rubbish by Swami. Please stop all this non-sense talk.

Student

» Email 02 TOP

Hi,

All the allegations against Sri Sathya Sai Baba are baseless and are false. I was a student of Sri Sathya Sai Higher Secondary School. I know almost all the students in the School and the Institute as all of us lived in the same hostel. With the interaction I had with Baba and all the students, I can say with confidence that no such thing as sexual molestation happens in Prasanthi Nilayam. All this is pure blasphemy intended to defame Baba, the divine.

Thanks,

M.

» Email 03 TOP

It’s NOT true. I studied there for 7 years and there is no such thing. I have 2 masters degrees from SSSIHL for which I paid nothing in the form of tuition fee or any other fee. I am a better man it’s all because of the teaching of Sai Baba and my teachers at the university.

As a webmaster you should be able to understand the kind of facilities we had at our computer science lab and compare them with other universities. We had (in 1997) a DEC Alpha server and 3 Alpha work stations for just 9 students of our class. Each of these servers can support hundreds of users. Most of the professors we have are from IITs(India’s premier technical institutes) and a few from well known universities in USA(Cornell etc.)

Regards,

N.

» Email 04 TOP

Dear fellow devotee,

This is really absurd. I do not know where you are getting this information from. Rumors always exist. In all cases these were started by some jealous people. I have studied at Prasanthi Nilayam from 1979-1984. There are always some students who spread these rumors to cover up their bad behavior. For example, a student whom I know quite well (he was in my class) was caught smoking in the college. The warden kicked him out of the college for smoking. When he left the college he started some silly rumor.

So my honest opinion is just ignore.

R.

» Email 05 TOP

Sairam XXX

Any way I appreciate that u asked frankly. I am one of the fortunate to know about saibaba what media is writing is just junk. there is nothing wrong happening in ashram. See few people when they do not get what they want they can go to any extent. why go so far take a couple who loved for years got married when they get divorce they say he/she is not good but till other day she/he was everything. just the media is creating hype which is junk. Swami (saibaba) takes care of everyone so well even my parents would have not taken care of me that well. If at all u are true to your profession go head and publish what I am telling see in this world people know only to speak bad about others they do not want good. when Jesus was on earth people crucified him but today there are billions of followers let us not make the same mistake. This mail is not structured what came to my mind I wrote it. Feel free if you want to know more.
with regards

and love

G.

» Email 06 TOP

Dear friend,

I was a student of Prasanthi Nilayam and I came out from there with an education not only in my field of specialization but also as a much better human being than I was before. I value what I obtained there and that is enough for me. I do not think I would be making an overstatement if I state these are the feelings echoing from the heart of every student who has come out of there.

Please be kind enough and refrain from sending me any more e-mails of this sort. Kindly also remove me from your mailing list.

A student

» Email 07 TOP

Dear Mr. XXX

I am glad you have sent me this mail.This indicates that you are seriously interested in knowing about Swami and not frivolous in believing hearsay’s/rumors.

I have been in Prasanthi Nilayam for 7 years and know for sure that there were no such cases of molestations.

In fact,we felt more comfortable at Puttaparthi than any where else for the warm feeling of love and togetherness which only true family/friends can provide.

Regards

V.

» Email 08 TOP

Please,

This is not new to me. I have heard these stupid and dirty things before. The people who spread these things are mentally sick. May Baba shower his grace on them so that they can get rid of the sick mentality.

I have stayed in the ashram for three years. I had the chance to witness several miracles of Baba. He has cured many people. And rests assure that you are also having a very sick mentality. You are doing a great harm to yourself by sending this email around to each and every student on the list. Talking such things and spreading these words around is a big sin. As Baba says “No one can get rid of his or her Karma”. You should stop sending emails immediately. There is no truth in such stories. Some sick person says this and another sick person like you trusts this and thus spreads this disease around. If you have time and energy please utilize this in spreading good thins around. Email stories which praise the almighty.

Certainly their are people around who speak like this about your religion. Wise ignore all this. Don’t do all this. I am telling you this for your own benefit.

Sai Ram

S.

» Email 09 TOP

Dear sir.

Thank you for writing to us and clarifying things rather than keeping doubts within you.

I am a person who has known Swami since I was in my first grade that  is past at least 19 years. I have studied in his Institute for about 7 years and in the time that I have spent there I can only say that such messages are but rumors and could be the act of people who  are more concerned about the spirituality of others than their own.

Believe me, to us, Swami (as we lovingly call him) is more like a mother father brother sister teacher friend all put together and there is no one, no one, I tell you, in this world who can reciprocate your love in such a way.
We have heard of lots of Gods and saints come by and gone but Sai Baba is a living example. I am not a fanatic. I am not insisting people to pray to him or follow him but just think a person who has:

1. build institutions throughout the country (with three main universities at Bangalore and  Andhra Pradesh) offering FREE education
2. build two BIG Super Specialty hospitals at Puttaparthi and Bangalore
3. done a major Water Project providing clean drinking water to lakes of people
4. whose guidance has made highly qualified people like Doctors engineers to offer their services free
5. who has made people think about their duty towards society and made people in the Sri Sathya Sai Seva organization one of the biggest Non Government Organizations to be performing yeoman service to people through out the world.

All this and many more and the reason behind this is only one single person: Sai Baba. Do you think such feats can be done by people who do not have control over themselves ?

To convince others first one must convince oneself and believe me Sai Baba’s conviction is like a mountain.

Rumors came and went by for even Jesus but his glory still remains.
If you need to swim, you need to first get into the water. In spirituality you first experience and then develop faith. Only in science you first observe for evidence and make the laws.

You need not believe in Sai Baba’s divinity but can at least get inspired to help someone out of your earning daily?

So friend please do not have such doubts. I am seeing some more of my friends to write to you so that you can rest at peace.

Thank you

May God bless you

Love

K.

» Email 10 TOP

Hi,
Good morning! As I don’t have enough time to answer all your questions, let me tell you this: “You ARE completely mistaken to get such negative ideas about the Ashram and more over about Sai Baba. I consider that the Ashram is the best place on the Earth and I did not face any situation or event which could even get me a remote doubt about the sanctity of the place and people there.

I have read your mail and your logic makes no sense to me. I am writing about your logic that went on like

“I have sent 90 emails, it is just possible for me to send ten emails a day from http://www.alumni.net, there are still 116 addresses to go, until now I received 8 answers from students, they were all very positive about Baba and his teachings and the general atmosphere in the Ashram, they are all convinced that there is no such thing as sexual abuse, so 82 students didn’t answer, let us say that 60 persons are not interested – this is just a loose estimate -, so that leaves us to 22 individuals, that hesitate to respond because of an other reason, and yes, I have to be honest, my email bounced 4 times, so that leaves me to 18 persons that should have another reason for not responding my email.”

First of all, all the students coming out of the SSSIHL are very well placed all over the busy world. Just because someone does not respond to your query, it gives no proof/disproof to any of your suppositions. For example, if I send some mail about some stupid stuff to all the presidents and/or prime ministers of all the countries, and do a survey like you are doing now, based on their not responding I can prove or disprove anything and everything in this world.

My point is that you must first know the basics of conducting a survey or poll. No logic in this great world accepts the “NO RESPONSE” as response “NO”. There is lot of difference between these two. I think you and your organization will be better off if you take some time to think about what I wrote. I am not interested in hurting anyone. I don’t need to prove/disprove anything to anyone. I am not doing that either. I care for you as a fellow being on this beautiful creation of GOD. Be happy and don’t waste your precious time. If you still want to spend time in this poll, do it in the right manner.

I request you that you please do not send me an email regarding any of your future polls like this, because I may not respond in which case you may get a chance to mis-interpret my “No response”.

Thanks for patient reading.

Have a great day

A.

» Email 11 TOP

Dear sir or who ever u are,

I appreciate ur attempt to explore the activities of Bhagawan Sri Satya Sai baba. But May I know with what capacity are u doing this, did someone personally complain to u.

I have the student of the ashram for a very longtime and know the place and people very well. I have acquired my knowledge and meaning for life only in the ashram. For me there is nobody more than Bhagawan and praying to him is the least I can do everyday to remember him.

Prasanthi Nilayam is abode of peace both for students and devotees. I think since you are getting such spiral misleading ideas it is better you visit the place and get some peace of mind. Only Bhagawan can help u in attaining peace of mind.

Dear sir, I have had lots of interviews with Baba and many a times a long chat but never had anything of such which u have mentioned happened to me. My sincere suggestion is before u start doing this exploration u better visit the place and have blessings of Baghawan and you might feel that the entire exercise you are doing is a futile one. I pray to Bhagawan to help you in taking right path in this short period of what you called life.

Sai ram

» Email 12 TOP

Dear Sir

Sai Baba is god …… All that has been projected, are all false allegations, do not consider them, only place in the world which is pure, serene, is Prasanthi Nilayam ……

greetings

Best Regards

S.

» Email 13 TOP

Dear friend,

I was a student at Sathya Sai Institute at Prasanthi Nilayam and have had interviews with Baba and have friends who were very close to baba.To me Sai Baba is god incarnate on earth and I have not felt or heard from any real sources the allegations that are being wired over the net as well as the allegations raised in your email. Even I was disturbed deeply with the allegations on the net and did my own enquiry. I even contacted some of the students whose name had appeared in the net. Nothing of this has ever happened according to my enquiry.Some of the stories are circulated falsely under the name of some students who were close to Baba and these students have no clue of the news. I can give you names if you need. Some of the news circulated in the net is totally false and I know it because I was there at the time period mentioned and no such thing had ever happened. Do not be carried away by these wild allegations. Sai Baba is god incarnate on earth and I have had personnel first hand experience of his Godhead. If u have any more questions feel free to ask.

Love and SaiRams

M.

» Email 14 TOP

Hi XXX

By way of introduction , let me say I am K. and a student of mathematics. This intro is to help that I have a very curious mind and a very logical and scientific thought process.

Just to put things in a different perspective,  I would like to quote Benjamin Disraeli who said, there are 3 kinds of lies :

” LIES , DAMNED LIES and STATISTICS”

So, I would suggest that your thought that your rationale of following the number of people who have not responded to your mail , is not conclusive as proof in itself that ur statements are true. Do you have any qualitative proof on this topic?

Secondly , in this fast moving world , god knows  how many people have dismissed your mail as yet another junk mail from a jobless , faceless guy that they do not know. God knows how many people even read it in the first place.

Sorry to say that your theory does not hold water.

Waiting for your rebuttal

Sincerely

K.

» Email 15 TOP

Dear Mr. XXX

First of all, I should commend you as an individual for having come out in the open with your doubts. That, I think, is an indicator of your willingness to form an opinion based on your findings rather than on hearsay.

Coming to your doubts, I would like to make one thing clear – Sai Baba, or Swami as we call him, is an Avatar. By definition, an Avatar is a highly-evolved being and will not, repeat, will not indulge in such a profane thing as sexual molestation. Why, any average human being will not indulge in such acts. What to  speak  of an Avatar! I speak this with the knowledge that I have gained from close interaction with Swami.

I can understand your doubts – they are caused by a number of reports that have started coming now, on the Net, and elsewhere. I consider this to be a test of your faith in Him. In case you have any doubts regarding Baba’s character, then, as a webmaster you have the added responsibility of finding out the truth for yourself. If you approach Swami with an open mind, you will find that such rumors are totally baseless because He is the very embodiment of Divinity.

I would recommend a visit to Puttaparthi to see things with your own eyes. I would be more than willing to help you in this regard.

The joy He gives to people living thousands of miles away – even in countries like the embattled Croatia – is  just incredible. If He is not Divinity, I ask you, who or what is?

Regards,

M.

» Email 16 TOP

What is ur intent? I have been a swami’s student for the last 7 years. Do tell me ur understanding of how a God man should be.

tell me

S.

» Email 17 TOP

Hello Mr. Sick XXX

My words can not change you or help you get out of the ugly and junk pot you are trying to stick your mind in.

I strongly recommend that you visit Baba once and I am sure Swami will put your sick mind at ease.

Without proper information, you have no right to stand on an intelligent pedestal and attempt to pose such stupid & outrightly junk questions at us.

Baba doesn’t need my vocal response to defend Him : He knows our hearts and we know His. You do not even deserve an answer or a response from any of us to your despicable emails.

But though I dont believe I can alter your filthy mind, I hope you stop sending these emails to my brothers and sisters. If you have the slightest guts and have even the slightest intelligence, go to Puttaparthi and give urself a week to get a true experience of the Divinity.

Help yourself, Even if Baba forgives you, I can not!

B.

» Email 18 TOP

Thanks for ur concern, there’s nothing the way u r thinking is happening at Puttaparthi, so please dont bother anymore and next time before you begin your investigation from your office or your drawing room at your residence u better go to the place and start looking at what you want to find, you would get all your answers rather than trying to make your own stories or presumptions. That would help you a lot, I believe, and for Gods sake please stop bothering us about it and mind your own business.

your well wisher.

» Email 19 TOP

Hello Mr. XXX

I am the recipient of the mail you have sent from Alumni.Net.

There is something I would like to know from you. If there is no problem can you tell me the name of the website you are webmaster of.
Have you ever visited India and in particular Prasanthi Nilayam. Have you had the opportunity of observing how Baba conducts himself.

If so I would like to ask you do you believe in what you have written in this letter. and if you are so concerned and want to do good for others my advise would be that you make a visit and see for yourself. Even earlier there was mention of these kind of things by some people I think in some of the magazines in India itself but I feel all this is done to gain some publicity. In my opinion you should go and see the place for yourself and then go about asking questions.

To answer your questions:

1. Yes I did have an opportunity to have an interview with Baba, but nothing like what you have mentioned has been observed or experienced by me.

2. Yes he does put his arm around you but only to pat you on the back or shoulder not for any other reason.

Hope this clarifies your doubts.

J.

» Email 20 TOP

Dear Friend.

Though I was a student I never had any interviews with Baba which eliminates all the questions you asked. But it certainly brought many facts of life to think about. But, I will not hesitate to say that my life is better now than it would have been.

Happy questing.

Another friend.

» Email 21 TOP

Hello XXX,

I never heard of such things happening! And, I just ignore what ever propaganda that’s going on against Swami.

I have enjoyed my stay as a student in Prasanthi Nilayam. I cherish those few years of my life very much. Even as old student I make regular visits to Prasanthi Nilayam to have His darshan. Many people told me that they were against Baba and they don’t believe Him, and some try to get into argument with me (which is never invited by me)…My only answer to all those people is, “I did not ask you to believe Him.. I appreciate if you let me live in my beliefs. I try to improve myself by practicing (in what ever little way I can) Swami’s teachings.

If you are not a believer/follower/devotee (what ever it is..) of Swami, please do not send any thing against Him to me.

I get hurt.

If you are a devotee of Swami, please never bother the crab that’s going on against Him.

With Best Regards,

S.

» Email 22 TOP

Dear Friend,
Sairam!

Well, to really know Sai Baba one has to see, feel and experience Him personally. One cannot… never know Who He really is….He is Beyond our Mind… So I suggest that You should make a visit to India and see.. meet Him. I think then your doubts and queries will be answered.

I think nobody Will ever be able to clear your doubt Except Sai Baba…..

Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

V.

Relevant Links:

Barry Pittard & Robert Priddy Associate Themselves With Proven Perverts

Barry Pittard is the self-professed “international coordinator in attempts to bring Sai Baba to justice” and is the founder of the bogus “global coalition” F.D.S.S.B.. His sidekick is the Anti-Sai Extremist from Oslo Norway, Robert Priddy. Although Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy have thrust themselves into the limelight as being the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement, they purposely suppress the fact that they explicitly, unabashedly and wholly endorse, promote and associate themselves with proven and known perverts, sexual deviants and pathological liars.

The following screen-caps show how both Pittard & Priddy solicit Sanjay Dadlani’s “Sai Baba EXPOSED” blog on their wordpress.com accounts (click on thumbnails to enlarge):
Robert Priddy Promoting Sanjays BlogBarry Pittard Promoting Sanjays Blog

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy see absolutely nothing wrong with Sanjay Dadlani’s homosexual-fantasizing slurs, Jesus Sex Fetish and Boot Sex Fetish. Although Sanjay went around secretly stalking innocent women (calling them “bitches” and “sluts”, saying “they want it”, calling Mothers “MILFs”, photographing females and teenagers up their dresses and under tables and publishing these photos on his streetbitches blog), Barry and Robert are right there holding hands with Sanjay. Shame on Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy!

Sanjay even posted on the QuickTopic Forum (using multiple fake names, including female names) and made disgusting comments under the name “Marquis de Sade”, even duplicating a post about a Priest ejaculating on the face of a little girl, as related by her brother. Sanjay even posted under the name “kick his head in” and said that someone should murder Sathya Sai Baba (of course, this is the same guy who rejoiced when a Sai Baba temple was bombed). Nice friend you have there, Barry & Robert.

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy are fully aware of Reinier van der Sandt’s very disturbing admission to viewing child pornography. Barry and Robert purposely ignore the fact that Reinier used numerous fake names on the SSB2 Yahoo Group and hold hands with him as well (as can be seen with their association with him through the exbaba website).

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy defend, promote and endorse perverts, defamers and liars. What does this say about Barry & Robert? I think the answer is self-evident. As they say, “Birds of feather flock together”.

M. Alan Kazlev On Wikipedia: Part 1

Exposing Martin Alan Kazlev, webmaster for Kheper.net, the biased Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba sympathizer.

Alan Kazlev makes such poorly researched arguments against me, I consider them utterly ridiculous. Nevertheless, to show how poorly Kazlev makes his arguments against me (and to reveal his bias) I will respond to some of his erroneous comments (made on Wikipedia) against me. These comments came from several discussions had on Robert Priddy‘s Wikipedia talk-page:

Alan Kazlev: btw Joe you make a false analogy. SSB is a public figure, and hence should be able to be criticised like any other well-known public figure. But Robert Priddy is in comparison a little-known writer, hence a great big long personal page dedicated to slandering him constitutes an ad homimen attack.

Obviously, Alan Kazlev is trying to re-define the word “slander” to suit whatever agenda he is trying to push. Slander is a spoken false statement injurious to a person’s reputation. If something is negative, but true, that is not “slander”. Anti-Sai Activists loosely use words like “slander”, “defamation”, “pedophilia”, “boys”, etc.

Alan Kazlev is flat out wrong about Robert Priddy. Priddy listed himself as a public figure on Wikipedia and has written hundreds of articles against Sathya Sai Baba. It is nothing less than sheer absurdity for Kazlev to claim that Priddy should not be criticized because he is a “little-known writer”. For Alan’s information, Priddy happens to be one of the most verbose writers against Sathya Sai Baba. Therefore, a critical analysis of Priddy’s claims, assertions, speculations and conspiracy theories is entirely and wholly justified (unless you happen to live in a communist country where free speech is not allowed).

What is ironic about all this is that Kazlev not only created “big long personal pages dedicated to slandering” me (which, of course, constitute “ad hominem attacks”) he also pretended to be a psychiatrist and implied I have mental disorders such as “obsessive-compulsive personality disorder” (aka OCPD or anankastic personality disorder), “projection of the ego” and “projection of the shadow”. Alan Kazlev has no credentials in the mental health or medical fields whatosever. Kazlev should stick to what he knows best: philosophizing and skimming over other’s research.

In my opinion, Alan Kazlev is a hypocrite. I assume Alan will now try to accuse me of “slandering” him because I called him a “hypocrite”. Fortunately, I live in the USA where we have freedom of speech and where people are entitled to have personal opinions. My opinion is that Alan is a hypocrite based on his contradictory actions and words. Examples: 1) Ranting about creating long pages against Priddy, but then turning around and doing the same thing to me and 2) Whining about “ad hominem attacks” and “slander” and then implying I have mental disorders. This type of behavior, in layman’s terms, is called “hypocrisy” and Alan suffers from it.

Alan Kazlev: As for your claims Joe, Robert Priddy’s websites are not, “full of ad hominem attacks against Sai Baba” as far as I understand the term. Which statements are you referring by Priddy which are genuine ad hominem arguments, if we define argumentum ad hominem as trying to discredit a statement by referring to an unrelated fault in the character of the person who made the statement, as you have repeatedly done against SSB critics (not just Robert Priddy but others as well). That is why I refer to your actions as slander (even if you don’t think that term applies to you). To prove someone is a liar for example one must be able to show that the person has intentionally stated an untruth knowing it to be untrue. Therefore you are defaming Priddy, while I cannot see that he has defaming you in this (or any other) way. I would also be interested if you could provide direct references with a link to anywhere that Priddy has posted anything where he actually calls you, personally, a liar or has defamed you.

Alan Kazlev: Joe you still in my opinion have presented no convincing evidence and have not shown that Robert defames you nor that he calls you a liar anywhere, which you do of him on innumerable occasions and without credible evidence. It seems to me that for you, a liar is virtually anyone who questions Sathya Sai Baba, and makes any statement that you find fault with, often because they will not entrust you with sensitive information. The link to the comments about you on Priddy’s webpages do not show any defamation of your character there, Certainly nothing more serious than you have written about me, for example (regarding which (from what i have seen) I have no complaints).

On This Webpage, Priddy said about me: “He widely propagates lies and slanders and the wildest kinds of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba…” Therefore, Priddy called me a liar. There is your link, Kazlev. As one can see, Kazlev just sits back on his rump, makes alls sorts of demands and does not even lift one finger to do the research himself. Kazlev expects others to spoon-feed him links, comments and references because he is a lazy armchair critic. After supplying Kazlev with links, comments and references, he ignores them if they do not argue in his favor.

I have responded to what I consider Priddy’s libelous comments against me on the following posts:

* Defamatory Attack One: Response 1
* Defamatory Attack One: Response 2
* Defamatory Attack One: Response 3

Even after spoon-feeding Kazlev with Priddy documented lies on Wikipedia, he totally ignored them. See the following documented lies from Robert Priddy on Wikipedia:

* Robert Priddy’s Phony “Phone” Lies
* Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
* Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
* Say What?
* Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
* Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
* Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
* A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
* Another Example Of Priddy’s Poor Research

And let us not forget Priddy’s vicious lie about Joy Thomas (not related to Wikipedia):

* Priddy’s Shameless Lie About Joy Thomas

All the information that Kazlev demands is right there under his nose. Kazlev is up to his neck in water and cries out he is thirsty. There is no satsifying a “skimmer” who admitted he does not have the “time”, “patience” or “inclination” to research my claims.

Alan Kazlev: As for the anonymity claim (Robert says you are, you say you aren’t), well, honestly, it makes no difference to me personally whether you are or want to be anonymous, or whether you are who you say you are (as long as you don’t slander others). On your page you make Robert out to be a liar for saying all this. But regarding this, Robert informed me that: “In a mail to Conny Larsson, he shows how Moreno used the IP 192.168.9.27 (PRIVATE no source available). This proves outright that he uses proxy IPs. This makes it impossible to prove definitively that he really is the author (as someone else could fake the mail content etc.)… not without a costly subpoena process. So what IS his real IP and why doesn’t he give his details?”

I’ve already discussed this issue in depth with Kazlev, which forced Priddy to update his article (although it did not do any good because Priddy still continued with his pathological and wholly unsupported lies against me). Click Here to view my article about Conny Larsson’s deception regarding my IP. I fully responded to this issue on my blogged post: Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3

Alan Kazlev: You like to advertise Robert Priddy’s IP on your own website and also on Wikipedia, but it is not hidden, neither is his address, phone number or publications. Similarily I am open about my dealings, i use my real name on wikipedia, not a username, so people know it is me. If you want to private and secretive, that is fine, I have no problems with that, but don’t then claim that those who report this are liars, or use your anonymity as a cloak to attack others. It does you no credit and undercuts what credibility you may otherwise have.

First of all, Kazlev needs to tell me where I “advertise Robert Priddy’s IP” anywhere on my site? I am not aware of having done so, nor can I find any reference to it. Priddy’s IP on Wikipedia is not “advertised” by me. It is advertised by Priddy himself because his IP is there next to any edits or comments he makes. My IP is also on Wikipedia. I have nothing to hide and never have.

Also, we do not know if Kazlev is truly being forthcoming about his identity or personal information. After all, Kazlev admitted that he changed his name (at least) twice. Furthermore, Kazlev does not provide his full name, full address or full phone number on his site. This must mean (using Priddy and Anti-Sai Activist’s standards) that he is not who he claims he is and is using a fake identity. Too bad Kazlev cannot live up to the same standards he defends Anti-Sai Activists for using against me. Also, Priddy openly refused to divulge his phone number because he didn’t want “unwanted disturbances”. Priddy has two addresses listed on Anti-Sai Sites and no one knows whether they are genuine, fake or outdated. In other words, Priddy fails to divulge the same contact details he demands from me. Priddy also fails to demand the same contact details from Kazlev that he demands from me. Hypocrisy, clear and simple.

Alan Kazlev: What is worse are the double standards. While guarding your own privacy so carefully, you make all sorts of allegations about ex-devotees, including slurs and inuendos regarding their private lives, as well as outright and blatant lies; e.g. they are paedophiles, pornographers, associate with white supremacists, etc etc.

Anti-Sai Activists are to blame for making their private lives available on the internet. Anti-Sai Activists have showed no compassion for the “private lives” of Sai Devotees and Proponents. Kazlev would have known this had he researched the matter. Unfortunately, Kazlev told me (several times) that he has not researched this matter because he does not have the “time”, “patience” or “inclination” to do so! The fact of the matter is that I have found shocking information that wholly undermines the alleged integrity and crediblity of Anti-Sai Activists. This is a fact and I have proof to back it up.

I never called anyone a “pedophile” or an “associate with white supremacists”. Alan is being untruthful. Reinier Van Der Sandt admitted, out of his own mouth that:

Reinier Van Der Sant: “I found lots of kiddy porno-sites with very much child porn pics, but…, but… it was impossible for me to watch it for very long, because when I was clicking on an image to enlarge, other pages were popping up so fast on my computer screen, that I could not open such a site, in fact, all kiddy porno sites – as what I have seen of it – have multi pop up techniques, which makes it difficult for the kiddy porno watcher to watch easily…Only in the opening pages I saw some kiddy porn, when I wanted to continue and see more, I had to suscribe and/or pay…Internet kiddy porno can be obtained, I have to correct myself on what I was previously writing on this board, I have been looking for kiddy porn on the internet – NOT AS A CUSTOMER, BUT BECAUSE I WANTED TO FIND OUT WHETHER ONE CAN OBTAIN EASILY FILTHY KIDDIE PORNO!!!” (Refs: OriginalDuplicate)

As one can see, my concern about Reinier’s viewing of child pornogrpahy is entirely warranted. I challenge any parent to tell me otherwise. After reading these shocking comments from Reinier, I rightly expressed concern over pictures he took of a child sucking on a popsicle. Strange enough, Kazlev agreed with me.

As a matter of fact, Kazlev skimmed through some yahoo posts where Reinier was using the name “sloppyjoemoreno” and said (verbatim): “is it Reinier using your name? i tell you, glancing through those yahoo posts, it seems like this guy and his buddy Sai Exposed are a bunch of adolescent fuckheads”. “Sai Exposed” is Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (the guy who Alan now defends). Kazlev also said of Reinier: “yep, he is one sick character alright… (the more one reads on all this, the dirtier one feels…ughh! Like swimming in a sewer)…i have to admit, the more i look into this guy the less i like him”. Kazlev is now defending Reinier as well (talk about a flip-flopper).

When I emailed Kazlev about his erroneous claim that I accused Anti-Sai Activists of being “associated with White Supremacits”, he responded by saying that I accused Barry Pittard with being “associated with White Supremacists” (a bold-faced and unscrupulous lie). It is exactly this type of poor research and inaccurate paraphrasing that wholly compromises Kazlev’s integrity. These serious and inaccurate mistakes also support my contention that Kazlev “skims” through information and makes stuff up to suit whatever agenda he is trying to push. When it come down to the cold, hard facts, Kazlev is clueless and cannot factually support his comments with actual references taken in context.

Alan Kazlev: You claim “Robert Priddy is relating more scurrilous fabrications and gutter untruths against me under the guise of anonymity.” But where is the proof of these assertions?

Here is the webpage in question. One will notice that this page is without a signature, is unattributed and does not have any external links. Therefore, it is anonymous. In it’s original form, it was first published anonymously on the “angeltowns2.net/tanik” domain. After it was deleted for defamatory content by AngelTowns2 (I reported it), Priddy then moved the article to the exbaba site where it was deleted and again moved to his chello.no site. Priddy then duplicated it to his home.no.net/abacusa site where it remains to this day unsigned and unattributed. There is your proof Kazlev. What’s the problem? Don’t have the “time”, “patience” or “inclination” to read my site and do the research for your yourself? I didn’t think so.

Alan Kazlev: You wrote “Priddy’s dirty and filthy websites”. You use of such language is imho just more examples of slander (and more shadow projection) on your part.

This was already discussed on my Priddy’s Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites blogged article. Kazlev confuses personal opinion with “slander”. If Kazlev doesn’t like personal opinions, he should live alone and try to avoid people as much as possible. Oh yeah, he already does that (with a self-admission)!

Alan Kazlev: To cite another example, you posted the slander of Dr. Leo Rebello against Priddy on your website. That is an implicit endorsement of Rebello’s statements and is I understand slanderous by law.

This is another poorly researched response from Kazlev. Where exactly did I get Rebello’s “slander” from in the first place? I got it from Priddy’s AngelTowns site! That’s right, Priddy published all of Rebello’s “slanderous” emails on a website that AngelTowns deleted for defamatory content. The site was online for almost a full year! Here is Rebello’s complaint to AngelTowns against Priddy. As I stated before, I believe it is true that Rebello defamed Priddy and vice-versa. The only difference in their defamation war was that Rebello did not create a website defaming Priddy (whereas Priddy created a website defaming Rebello). And yes, the website belonged to Priddy. As a matter of fact, Priddy’s past comment about Rebello (in which he claimed the AngelTowns site as his) can still be viewed online: Reference.

Alan Kazlev: Your allegations about Priddy on porn sites are unverified, and hence defamatory and slanderous. How do we know that someone (I wonder who?) has used his website title in signing up for those sites?

This is another poorly-researched comment from Kazlev. I already blogged about this issue in my article Priddy’s Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites. I screen-captures 4 google pages containing 7 sexually explicit sites that listed Priddy’s webpage. Even Lisa saw these sites when they were up. Kazlev’s claim that my allegations are “unverified” is untrue. Therefore, it is not “slander” as he contends.

Alan Kazlev: You also say things like “Heil Priddy” and other similar slanderous language.

I said “Heil Priddy” because Priddy demanded that I divulge my full name, full address and full phone number (that he already has) or I am not who I say I am. However, when it came to Barry Pittard, Priddy said about his address, “one which any citizen has a right to keep private if he or she wishes”. Therefore, I had a reason for saying what I did. I pointed out Priddy’s double-standards and equivocation (Ref: See Last Post). Priddy demands one standard from me, yet exempts Anti-Sai Activists from the same standard. This is cultish, hypocritical and dictatorial. Therefore, my comment (“Heil Priddy”) is not “slander”. It is a personal sentiment used to highlight what I perceived to be a valid point.

Alan Kazlev: But where is the reference that Robert Priddy thinks this is justified? You try to smear him simply by his association with others whose statements and acts he is not responsible for. And what i find really emotionally immature is the way you try to ridicule him by using a ridiculous nickname, which to me shows only a spiteful attitude on your part. I have already mentioned on my website your use of this name to mock and ridicule. So haw can you claim respectability when you act like that?

This is yet another poorly-researched comment from Kazlev. Priddy accused me of posting images of a “pornographic kind” on my website, yet never complained about images of a “pornographic kind” published by Reinier Van Der Sandt and Sanjay Dadlani. The images I published were anonymously sent to me by “Premaperm”. Since Priddy “smeared” me “by association”, why can’t I use the same standard with him? Kazlev demands a certain standard from me, yet cares less about the standards used by Priddy and Anti-Sai Activists. This points to Kazlev’s bias and partisonship and where his loyalty lies.

Over the course of a year, Kazlev also accused me several times of using a “ridiculous nickname”, being “emotionally immature”, being “spiteful”, employing “mock and ridicule” and having “adolescent childishness” for referring to Priddy as “Priddles”. Kazlev (caring less for facts and more for judgmentalism) resorted to ad hominem attacks without even checking his facts. “Priddles” is a known name of Priddy’s (that he divulged on former webpages, which have since been deleted). Only after repeating myself a couple of times did Kazlev finally confirm this fact with Priddy himself. Needless to say, Kazlev then changed his argument against me and then accused me for using a childhood name of Priddy. Kazlev was shamed once again for his poor research and tried to escape responsiblity by blaming me by using a different argument.

Alan Kazlev: You also make many unsupported assumptions and statements, for example, “I fully know the depth of corruption and decay prevalent among Anti-Sai Activists (Robert Priddy included).” This emotionalistic statement is again slanderous.

Alan is once again confusing personal opinion with “slander”. I am perfectly entitled to my opinion about Robert Priddy, based on my research into his accusations (research Kazlev admitted he has never conducted himself). This statement, from Kazlev, is a perfect example on how he tries to twist “personal opinion” into “slander”. If Alan does not like for others to have personal opinions, he should move to a communist country.

WIKIPEDIA REFERENCES:
Wikipedia References For This Article (read sections in green):
010203

Reference