Fighting The Smears – Sai Petition And More Sexual Abuse Libels

Fighting The Smears – Sai Petition And More Sexual Abuse Libels

Joe Moreno has had to write several “fighting the smears” articles (Refs: 0102030405060708) to refute Robert Priddy’s internet propaganda, libels and complete disinformation.

In yet another illustrative example of Robert Priddy’s fairy-tale mentality (which appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia) is a complete and utter fabrication of facts against Moreno on his Anti-Baba conspiracy blog. Robert Priddy said:

Absurd Claims By Robert Priddy

Absurd Claims By Robert Priddy

Robert Priddy: “His case rested mainly on his having been able to make some false submissions to the petition before it was protected properly from such spamming (in its new location) – including a bogus entry he boasts about having made under the bogus name Joe Apodaco or the like. [Note that Joe Moreno gave no documentary proof he made that entry. However, it was removed just in case.]

At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature! Interestingly – and perhaps unconsciously revealing a Freudian slip – for Joe Moreno was actually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, though he denies that the lowering of his pants and massaging with oil on his “lower stomach” was what the law (even in India) defines it as – sexual molestation when not performed with consent by a doctor of medicine. (See Basava Premanand’s discussion with Moreno on this)”

Sai Petition And The ‘Joe Apodaca’ Submission:
Click Here To Read More About The Bogus ‘Sai Petition’ that Robert Priddy made reference to. Of course, Robert Priddy miserably failed to inform his readers (as he typically does) that Moreno was able to submit multiple submissions to the Newer Sai Petition and those submissions were approved by the Sai Petition administrators!

The Older Sai Petition allowed for anyone to submit as many comments he/she so desired without any sort of verification process in place (with an admission from Robert Priddy himself). Therefore, the first 824 “signatures” on the Older Sai Petition have rightly been called into question by Robert Priddy himself. Thank you Mr. Priddles!

Why should Moreno provide “documentary proof” that he submitted the name of “Joe Apodaca” to the Sai Petition? If the Sai Petition is truly a legitimate and legal petition (as critic’s allege) they should be able to contact “Joe Apodaca” and verify the submission for themselves. The fact that critic’s were/are unable to verify Joe Apodaca’s submission is “documentary proof” enough that Moreno made it!

Robert Priddy Falsifies Yet Another Sexual Abuse Claim:

Robert Priddy: “At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature!”

Robert Priddy falsely claimed that Moreno stated he had been “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba under the pseudonym of “Joe Apodaca”! Robert Priddy completely fabricated this claim and (once again) cannot source it to any verifiable references whatsoever.

However, Moreno can reference his rebuttal that he never (ever) submitted a signature to the bogus Sai Petition with any comment claiming (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba. See for yourself (names submitted were “Joe Apodaca”, “Joe M”, “J M”, “Isaac Nivek” and “Kevin Iassa”):

Submissions On The New Sai Petition

Submissions On The New Sai Petition


Submissions On The Old Sai Petition

Submissions On The Old Sai Petition


Under the name “Joe Apodaca”, Moreno said: “I had a friend who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram”. Nowhere did Moreno claim (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba as falsely and maliciously stated by senile Robert Priddy. See a screencap of the Google search results for yourself:
Google Results Screencap

Google Results Screencap


Moreno also sent Robert Priddy an email about the name “Joe Apodaca” on July 24th 2005:
Email To Priddy About Apodaca Submission

Email To Priddy About Apodaca Submission

From: Joe (July 24th 2005)
Subject: Remove Fake Name:
To: Robert Priddy

Dear Mr. Priddles,

I wanted to bring to your attention that you have published a fake name on your “Ex-Office Bearers” site, located at:

http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm

If you had only cared to read my site a little more thoroughly, you would have noticed that I clearly stated that “Joe Apodaca” was one of several fake names I used to expose the inherent dishonesty in the submission policy at SaiPetition.net. I even provided a screen capture to these fake names (which has been on my site since November 2004)!

Check for yourself:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/sathya-sai-baba-and-petition-saipetitionnet.html

Although I used various derivatives of my name ‘Joe’ (2 of which were deleted from SaiPetition.net), I did not lie about knowing someone who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s Ashram. Michael Oliver was a very good friend of mine (his parents live 50 miles away from me). I was amazed that you met him (I read about it in your book). He never mentioned your name to me. Not even once.

At any rate, it makes one wonder why you would publish someone’s name, and a comment they made, without caring to verify their identity or their claim. This nicely makes my case that the signatures on SaiPetition.net are not verified (I happened to use a fake email as well). It also makes my case that Anti-Sai Activists (like yourself) disperse information ‘willy-nilly’, caring less for factual integrity and caring more for negative content.

Consequently, to save yourself further embarrassment, I suggest you make the necessary correction immediately. Although I must tell you that I have already screen captured the page and saved the cache. Maybe I can write an article, like the one you did with the Sai Organisation and the Westminster Cathedral? After all, you have such a fervent dedication to the truth, I am sure you wouldn’t mind if I applied the same standard to you that you apply to others.

Have a nice day.

Sincerely,

Joe Moreno

Further solidifying Moreno’s rebuttal are archived links going back to 2005 that prove Moreno never (ever) claimed he was sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba under his “Joe Apodaca” pseudonym:

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man who loves to tell dirty stories about others. Barry Pittard (a pseudo-moralist and heart-string-plucker extraordinaire) loves to revel in Robert Priddy’s dirty stories and actually endorses them! Of course, Barry Pittard has his own fair share of criticism regarding his highly questionable past. How can anyone believe anything Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard have to say about Sathya Sai Baba when they shamelessly libel others?

Pervert Priddy Continues Sexual Abuse Libels:
Robert Priddy formerly libeled Moreno as being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba and claimed that Moreno said his pants were lowered by the Guru! Of course, Moreno never (ever) made the fabricated claims that Robert Priddy attributed to him. Now, however, Robert Priddy is claiming that Moreno said his “lower stomach” was “massaged” with oil by Sathya Sai Baba. Moreno never (ever) claimed he was “massaged” with oil. Alan Kazlev (Robert Priddy’s psychic & reincarnating friend) is to be attributed with that disinformation.

The big question is:

WHY is Robert Priddy so sexually focused on Moreno’s non-sexual interview?

Robert Priddy is like a sexual deviant who can’t stop fantasizing about the possibility that Moreno was sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba and keeps on twisting Moreno’s words with sexual innuendo and sexual inferences not rooted in fact.

  • If Robert Priddy openly falsifies sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?
  • If Barry Pittard openly endorses falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other falsified sexual molestation claims is he endorsing as well?

One must remember that Robert Priddy is actually trying to make the argument that even though Moreno explicitly stated he was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, one must ignore Moreno’s first-hand words and clarifications and instead rely on Robert Priddy’s sexual inferences based on descriptions he fabricated against Moreno! This from a man who claims he has not told a single lie!

Robert Priddy should stop embarrassing himself and the Anti-Sai Movement he defends. As one can see, Robert Priddy’s failing memory (strongly indicative of senile dementia) is getting him into a lot of trouble. Robert Priddy’s proven pathological lies have thoroughly compromised his so-called credibility and integrity. Those who support Robert Priddy’s gutter untruths (such as Barry Pittard, Timothy Conway, Kevin Shepherd, Alan Kazlev, Brian Steel, Serguei Badaev, Reinier Van Der Sandt, Andries Krugers Dagneaux, Basava Premanand, et al) are similarly compromised.

What next will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth (besides spit, invective, libel and disinformation)? One can be certain that many things will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth, but the truth won’t be one of them.

%d bloggers like this: