Dilip Rajeev, White Adept & The Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article

Dilip Rajeev, White Adept & The Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article

Dilip Rajeev

Dilip Rajeev

Public Photo Of Dilip Rajeev Curtesy The Hindu & Amrita (PDF)

Dilip Rajeev Using Sockpuppet “User:White_Adept” To Push Exclusive & Fanatic One-Sided Bias And Hate Against Sathya Sai Baba On Wikipedia. More Proof Of Wikipedia’s Disinformation And POV-Pushers.


Introduction To Dilip Rajeev:
Dilip Rajeev claims that he is a computer scientist, a mensa member, an amateur homeopath, an algorithmist (a semi-finalist in Microsoft Imagine Cup, algorithmics round), an amateur bach flower therapist, a graduate of Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (a college founded by the Indian Guru Ammachi) and a Software Development Engineer for Microsoft’s Research & Development. Dilip Rajeev is the Webmaster and registrant for bachtherapy.org, a website promoting Falun Dafa and the Bach Flower Therapy of Dr. Edward Bach.

Dilip Rajeev And His Wikipedia Sockpuppet “White_Adept”:
Despite Wikipedia’s policies regarding Sock Puppetry (which states that a user should have only one account), User:Dilip Rajeev (Talk | Contribs) uses the sockpuppet User:White Adept (Talk | Contribs) on Wikipedia [ “White Adept’s” account has since been deleted (see bottom of page). “White Adept’s” controversial edits on the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article can be Found Here ].

Before Dilip Rajeev got involved with the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article, he was contributing and making edits to the ‘Sex Magic’ Wikipedia Article. While discussing the Sex Magic article, “White Adept” asked another Wikipedia editor to contact him at dilip_rajeev@msn.com (Refs: 0102 ), thus revealing his true identity.

In addition to using the names “Dilip Rajeev” and “WhiteAdept” on Wikipedia, he also made edits under the following IPs (which all resolve to India):

Based on Dilip Rajeev’s use of these IPs (90% of which resolve to articles dealing with Kerala, the state in India where Dilip resides), it is strongly indicated he also posted under the name “Valsaraj” and attempted to change this name to “Vidhu” (Refs: 0102). Dilip Rajeev (aka “White Adept”) also posted under the sockpuppet Researcher31 (Refs: 0102). This was revealed when “Researcher31” specifically responded to a post addressed to “White Adept”. When “Researcher31” realized the name “White Adept” did not appear as his signature, he removed the name “Researcher31” from his reply.

Dilip Rajeev’s first edits on the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article clearly reveal his Anti-Sai antagonism, bias and POV pushing. As a matter of fact, Dilip Rajeev’s first known edit on the Sathya Sai Baba talk page (using his “White_Adept” sockpuppet) was:

“NEWS: SAI BABA EXPOSED
Watch this video: http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=CNOCCIrz1fE
White adept (Talk) 19:24, 8 January 2009 (UTC)”

Dilip Rajeev’s first known edit on the Sathya Sai Baba main page (using his “White_Adept” sockpuppet) was:

“Video such as http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=CNOCCIrz1fE this exposing his tricks abound on websites such as youtube and metacafe. http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=CNOCCIrz1fE Youtube. Sai Baba Exposed”

Dilip Rajeev has subsequently replaced any and all favorable material about Sathya Sai Baba (even material referenced to reliable and reputable sources) with poorly sourced, defamatory and libelous material. Dilip Rajeev even had the audacity to remove all information pertaining to Sathya Sai Baba’s nationally and internationally recognized charitable causes (discussed in numerous newspapers) and removed all official website links from the article. This type of blatant bias has been in place on Wikipedia for years and Dilip Rajeev is even being guided and prompted by Andries Krugers Dagneaux (a caustic critic and defamer of Sai Baba).

Dilip Rajeev even uploaded a purposely distorted picture of Sathya Sai Baba on Wikipedia (with complete impunity). This proves that Wikipedia is unregulated, that information found on Wikipedia may not be credible or accurate and that Wikipedia articles can be taken-over by malicious individuals at any given time:

White Adept Distorted Picture

White Adept Distorted Picture


Dilip Rajeev – Falun Gong / Falun Dafa Cult Member:
Amusingly, Dilip Rajeev is an ardent and fanatic promoter, practitioner and “cult member” of Falun Gong (also known as “Falun Dafa”), which is widely regarded as a “cult” (using the very same standards and arguments that Dilip uses against Sathya Sai Baba). Dilip Rajeev devoted an entire webpage to Falun Dafa on his personal bachtherapy.org domain (Ref), made numerous controversial edits about Falun Gong on Wikipedia and was temporarily banned several times from Wikipedia for “edit warring”, “disruptive editing” and “3RR violations” (Ref). As a matter of fact, Dilip Rajeev made over 3,000 edits on Wikipedia ‘Falun Dafa’ related pages (Ref) and has posted numerous & verbose comments on online forums and groups soliciting the benefits and teachings of Falun Dafa.

Falun Dafa instructs adherents to abide by the principles of truthfulness, compassion and forbearance. The philosophy preaches “cultivation of virtue and character”, “moral standards for different levels” and “salvation of all sentient beings”. Needless to say, Dilip Rajeev’s malicious edits on the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article show that he is incapable of reconciling his precept with practice.

Dilip Rajeev – Authority On “Sex Magic” And “Black Magic”:
Dilip Rajeev made numerous edits on the Wikipedia article for Sex Magic (Ref) and removed entire sections from the article because he felt that Wikipedians would suffer a “karmic burden” for allowing “black rites” and “black teachings” to be dispersed on Wikipedia. See (Refs: 010203):

“Black Rites: Friend, What is described in the page are the rites of the teneberous ones- black magic in its most grotesque form. Sex, the ninth sphere is ineffably divine and if abused results in terrible karmic consequences. I urge you to go through the teachings on (link) And the book ‘Perfect Matrimony’ (link) also the books available here: (link) That is why I blanked some of the content. If we take such black teachignss to the people, we ourselves will have to bear the karmic burden – how many souls will we have lead down the wrong path?”
White adept 03:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

“I dont udnerstand why you consider a long description of some grotesque ritual to be just perfect for the page. Anyway its your wish and the consequences your karma. I will just leave it that way and add another pragraph on the teachings of the Gnostic White Lodge.”
White adept 04:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Dilip Rajeev also stated that Rajneesh was a “black magician” (Ref).

I wonder what “karmic consequences” Dilip Rajeev will have to face for his defamations, bias and hate on Wikipedia?

Dilip Rajeev – Bach Flower Therapy:
Dilip Rajeev is such a staunch believer and endorser of Bach Flower Therapy, he created his own bachtherapy.org domain soliciting the practice. Some relevant information about Bach Flower Therapy:

Rather than being based on medical research, using the scientific method, Bach’s flower remedies were intuitively derived and based on his perceived psychic connections to the plants. If he felt a negative emotion, he would hold his hand over different plants, and if one alleviated the emotion, he would ascribe the power to heal that emotional problem to that plant. He believed that early morning sunlight passing through dew-drops on flower petals transferred the healing power of the flower onto the water, so he would collect the dew drops from the plants and preserve the dew with an equal amount of brandy to produce a mother tincture which would be further diluted before use. Later, he found that the amount of dew he could collect was not sufficient, so he would suspend flowers in spring water and allow the sun’s rays to pass through them.

A recent database review of randomized trials concluded:“The hypothesis that flower remedies are associated with effects beyond a placebo response is not supported by data from rigorous clinical trials” (Ref).

All randomized double-blind studies, whether finding for or against the remedies, have suffered from small cohort sizes but the studies using the best methodology were the ones that found no effect over placebo (Ref: 0102). The most likely means of action for flower remedies is as placebos, enhanced by introspection on the patient’s emotional state, or simply being listened to by the practitioner. The act of selecting and taking a remedy may act as a calming ritual.
Wikipedia Reference

Dilip Rajeev – Other Interesting Beliefs:
In addition to Dilip Rajeev’s beliefs in Falun Dafa, black magic, black rites, bach flower therapy, sex magic, karmic consequence, etc., he also advocated for the extraterrestrial origins of the Giza Faces and Cydonia Face on Mars (Ref) and stated that he does not believe in evolution (apparently, he is a creationist), does not believe in the fossil record and stated that science is a “decadent religion” and an “evil religion advocating unleashing all animal impulses, destroying one’s conscience and life, demanding a blind allegiance to what it presents to you as ‘truths’…” (Ref). Dilip Rajeev is also a believer and promoter of Gnosticism (which advocates intuitive knowledge over rational or reasoned thought) and has repeatedly referred Wikipedians to gnosis-related websites (Refs: 010203). This is the type of loon that is dictating content on the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Article.

02-14-09 Update: Dilip Rajeev – The Unfolding Of A Fraud:
After sending Dilip Rajeev the link to this article, he responded by claiming he was a Sai Devotee:

Dilip Rajeev Claims To Be A Sai Devotee

Dilip Rajeev Claims To Be A Sai Devotee

Dear Joe,

This should be some misunderstanding on your part. The IP “218.248.78.57”, I have looked up and identified to be a shared IP through which all traffic from the ISP BSNL ( wireless connection) is routed. Many of my friends are sai devotees and there have been bhajan conducted in my house as well. The person you encircled is also a sai devotee.

I request you to clarify the misunderstanding with whoever put up the page and kindly take the page down.

Yours Truly,
Dilip Rajeev

Needless to say, more research was conducted and it was soon discovered that Dilip Rajeev widely uses the internet nic “rdilip”. For example, Dilip Rajeev uses the nic “rdilip” on digg.com:

Dilip Rajeev On <em>digg.com</em>

Dilip Rajeev On digg.com

Dilip Rajeev (rdilip)
A 24 year-old gentleman from Trivandrum, India (IN) who joined Digg on November 10th, 2008

Further research revealed that Dilip Rajeev (aka “rdilip”) favorited the very same Anti-Baba videos that “White Adept” solicited against Sathya Sai Baba on Wikipedia (Refs: 0102):

RDillip Anti-Baba YouTube

RDillip Anti-Baba YouTube


This information conclusively proves that Dilip Rajeev is not a Sai Devotee and that he is “White Adept”. Dilip Rajeev is a bold-faced liar and a fraud with proof.

Dilip Rajeev – In Conclusion:
Dilip Rajeev is a true believer and a selective critic who pretends to be a skeptic and conscientious objector when it comes to Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba. However, Dilip Rajeev is in reality a pathological prevaricator and a gullible, naive and superstitious individual given to very amusing personal beliefs that thoroughly compromise his pseudo-intellectual posturing on Wikipedia.

Although Dilip Rajeev attempted to conceal his identity on Wikipedia (by using the sockpuppet “White_Adept”) he inadvertently disclosed his true identity and is now having to suffer the results of that one oversight. Maybe there is something to that “karma philosophy” after all?

Reference

MAJOR UPDATE – Dilip Rajeev Banned For Sockpuppetry On Wikipedia:
(click thumbnail to enlarge)

Dilip Rajeev aka White Adept aka Researcher31 All Banned On Wikipedia For Sockpuppetry

Dilip Rajeev aka White Adept aka Researcher31 All Banned On Wikipedia For Sockpuppetry


A person using the name “drpms” filed a sockpuppetry claim against Dilip Rajeev on Wikipedia on April 30th 2009 (apparently using the information on this page for the complaint) and within 31 hours, the evidence was deemed so overwhelming, Dilip Rajeev was blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia for sockpuppetry (Ref) and so where his known sockpuppets of “White Adept” (Ref) and “Researcher31” (Ref).

All I can say is “Thank Goodness!”

UPDATE – Dilip Rajeev’s Account Reactivated:
Dilip Rajeev fully admitted that he used the sockpuppets “White Adept” and “Researcher31” (Ref) and requested that those accounts be deleted (Refs: 0102), which was granted (effectively removing his “White Adept” sockpuppet name from hundreds of controversial edits on the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia article). Dilip Rajeev claimed he wanted to be anonymous on the basis that critics of Sathya Sai Baba are targeted with violence by Sai Devotees! An uttery absurd and ridiculous claim. To Date: Ex-Devotees cannot cite even one credible instance where any critic of Sathya Sai Baba ever met with any type of violence from any Sai Devotee.

6 Responses

  1. 1. Where’s the evidence that Dilip Rajeev is White Adept?

    2. Some of the comments are from 2006.

  2. Take back the first point. This appears to be about 2 and a half years old? Please clarify the relevance for 2009.

  3. Presulem, what is the relevance for 2009? The fact that “White Adept” (aka “Dilip Rajeev”) is currently dominating the Wikipedia article for Sathya Sai Baba in 2009 with malicious untruths, defamations and libels. That is the “relevance for 2009”.

  4. There is also this diff on Wikipedia where the name was changed from “White Adept” to “Dilip Rajeev”.

  5. Results for the Sockpuppet Investigation of Dilip Rajeev: All banned: “User:Dilip_rajeev”; “User:White adept” and “User:Researcher31”.

  6. Thank you for the update, “Update”! I will add those details tonight.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: