Arnold Schulman – Screenwriter, Author and Playwright

Arnold Schulman

Born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Schulman attended the University of North Carolina where he took writing courses. He served with the Navy, and in 1946 came to New York City, where he began to write in earnest. He studied playwriting with Robert Anderson (Tea and Sympathy) in classes at New York’s American Theatre Wing, scripted for television during the early 1950s, making a transition to Hollywood films in 1957.

Schulman received Oscar nominations for Best Original Screenplay for Love with the Proper Stranger in 1963 and for Best Adapted Screenplay for Goodbye, Columbus in 1969. He also received three Writers Guild nominations for Best Screenplay for Wild Is the Wind, A Hole in the Head and Love with the Proper Stranger, and a Writers Guild award for Goodbye, Columbus. Arnold Schulman authored a book entitled “Baba”, Viking Press, New York, 1971, which was a biography of Indian guru Sathya Sai Baba.

Arnold Schulman And The Sathya Sai Baba Debate
Sathya Sai Baba critics Sanjay Dadlani, Brian Steel and Robert Priddy have made reference to one page in Arnold Schulman’s book “Baba” to formulate the argument that there are discrepancies between Sathya Sai Baba’s “official” biography and biographical information obtained by Arnold Schluman from Sathya Sai Baba’s sister.

For example, Sanjay Dadlani made the following argument (which was similarly parroted by Brian Steel and Robert Priddy):

Just one example of this relates to the tale of a cobra, which allegedly appeared miraculously after Sathyanarayana Raju (Sai Baba’s birth name) was born. As Schulman noted: “One of Baba’s two sisters, however, who claims to have been present at his birth, says that the cobra was not found under the blanket, but several hours after Baba was born a cobra was seen outside the house, a sight not uncommon in the village.” It is curious to see how this significantly differs from several “official” accounts of the cobra event.

The funny thing about this is how N. Kasturi claimed to have collected his material by interviewing various family members and villagers. Kasturi dated this incidence as happening in July 1948, and later reveals that the book was finally published in 1960. Assuming that he included Baba’s own sister in his research project, that left a comfortable twelve years for compiling and publishing an authorised biography with the input of Sai Baba and several contemporaries. How fascinating it is to observe a close member of the Baba’s family disagreeing with a staple of the Sai mythos, leading one to wonder why Kasturi’s little anecdote was allowed to be left in at all? For me, the reason was clear; the propaganda machine thought nothing of overblowing this out of all proportion in order to promote the idea that Sai Baba is an incarnation of Vishnu.

In conclusion, we can carefully consider that there is a huge gulf between facts and interpretations of those facts. If anything tangible is to be gleaned from Schulman’s quote, it is that Sai Baba aggressively halted discussion about his past for a clear reason; the stories of all or most of his early escapades are probably untrue.

Needless to say, critics did not tell the whole story and apparently forgot to turn the page to read what Arnold Schulman had to say about Sathya Sai Baba’s sister and how he obtained information from her. Arnold Schulman said:

In some cases interpreters were needed to interpret the interpreters, as in the case of the interviews with one of Baba’s sisters who spoke only Telugu. At that particular time the available interpreters were a young man who spoke only Hindi and English, but no Telugu, and another young man who spoke Telugu and Hindi but no English. Everything the sister said had to be translated by one of the young men from Telugu into Hindi and then by the other young man from Hindi into English. Not only was this procedure frustratingly time-consuming but after being filtered through two separate and distinct personalities, what the writer was told the sister said might very well have been something quite different from what she actually said.

Are we to believe Kasturi’s biographical material on Sathya Sai Baba (when he actually spoke Telugu and had close, repeated, long-term and direct access to Sathya Sai Baba’s sister) or are we to believe information that Arnold Schulman obtained through two young translators whose accuracy even he strongly doubted?

It is also significant to point out that the biographical information that Arnold Schulman independently obtained and published in his book about Sathya Sai Baba is 99% the same as the biographical information obtained by Kasturi (a fact often overlooked by Sai Baba critics).

Even though critics continually attempt to use Arnold Schulman’s book against Sathya Sai Baba, it is an indisputable fact that Arnold Schulman had an entirely positive view about Sathya Sai Baba and his book received stunning reviews, even from Faubion Bowers who said of it:

“Arnold Schulman has written a miracle, photographed the invisible, incarnated ectoplasm in tangible words. More brilliant than any of his screenplays, but with their narrative suspense and superb character depiction, Baba is a poem of reality on multitudes of planes. Spiritually, for those who have the antennae, the book is an ultrasonic, transcendental experience. I was stunned by his book. It is a really fantastic venture into truth-telling.” – Faubion Bowers

It is also peculiar that critics of Sathya Sai Baba love to highlight the fact that Arnold Schulman entertained doubts about Sathya Sai Baba’s alleged God-hood. What is so amusing about critic’s highlighting Schulman’s doubts is that they (i.e., Sanjay Dadlani, Brian Steel and Robert Priddy) all formerly accepted and praised Sathya Sai Baba as God Incarnate and the Avatar of the Age.

It is very strange how critics condemn the very beliefs they once held about Sathya Sai Baba for many years (even decades) as belonging to the brainwashed, gullible, naive and mentally challenged. Since critic’s current criticisms speak volumes about their past brainwashing, gulliblity, naivete and mental challenges, what’s make them any more believable and credible now?

QuickTopic Forum – An Introduction
QuickTopic is an instant messaging forum that allows anyone to create a board that can be used for online collaboration. These boards allow anyone to post any comment he/she chooses under the guise of complete anonymity. Even the board-moderator cannot view IPs unless the board has been upgraded to the Pro-version.

QuickTopic Board: “Sathya Sai Baba, 2005, Who Is He?”
On February 11th 2005, Freestone Wilson (a neutral party, open-minded to both sides of the Sai Controversy) created the QuickTopic board FE68KidtskS, which was named “Sathya Sai Baba, 2005, who is he?” After discussing the shocking behavior and vicious defamations being made by ex-devotees of Sathya Sai Baba on this board, Freestone Wilson (the original creator and moderator of the board) agreed to hand it over to Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno. On April 3rd 2007, Moreno officially became the moderator for the the board and promptly ugraded it to the Pro-version, giving him access to the IP history for all posts.

What is an ‘IP’? Information About IPs:
An IP is an acronym for “Internet Protocol”, which is an address that can uniquely identify a computer-user to his/her ISP (Internet Service Provider). An IP usually resolves to a “netname” and country unless it is a proxy IP. Proxy IPs are generated by masking one’s real IP with an anonymous IP generated through an anonymous server. An IP contains 4 sets of numbers that are separated by periods (for example: 213.78.122.150). IPs usually fall within a “range” that makes the last 2 sets of number static. For example, the IP: 213.78.122.150 would fall into the IP range:

213.78.64.0 – 213.78.127.255

This means that the last 2 sets of numbers may vary between 64.0 to 127.255. Although these last 2 sets of numbers may be static, they will not change the ISP, netname or country that the IP resolves to and is not indicative of multiple users or different computers.

QuickTopic Deception By Tony O’Clery:
Tony O’Clery posted messages on QuickTopic, Wikipedia and Yahoo Groups that came from the IP range 24.207.0.0 – 24.207.127.255:

• - 24.207.57.7
• - 24.207.41.219
• - 24.207.24.230
• - 24.207.41.52
• - 24.207.11.151
• - 24.207.41.166
• - 24.207.54.33
• - 24.207.51.175
• - 24.207.53.185
• - 24.207.41.52

All of these IPs resolve to Delta, British Columbia, Canada and specifically identify O’Clery as the user. Tony O’Clery also posted under the IP range 24.207 on the QuickTopic Board and used the following fake names:

1. sb cannot control karma
2. J Edgar Hoover fbi
3. sigmund freud
4. pedohunter
5. pedopatrol
6. Angelic
7. Joe Moreno
8. nino
9. Jedgar
10. freestone wilson
11. Juan
12. sucked by baba
13. joe108
14. Simon Brace
15. Simon
16. bollocky bill
17. Antoin O’Cleiragh
18. Jai Hanumanji
19. dingo
20. tony o’clery
21. CO2000

2925 – 2924 – 2419 – 2912 – 2909 – 2908 – 2907 – 2905 – 2903 – 2902 – 2901 – 2898 – 2984 – 2891 – 2889 – 2887 – 2884 – 2883 – 2848 – 2846 – 2815 – 2779 – 2778 – 2777 – 2775 – 2774 – 2773 – 2770 – 2769 – 2765 – 2762 – 2744 – 2733 – 2739 – 2722 – 2721 – 2717 – 2716 – 2714 – 2711 – 2709 – 2702 – 2700 – 2698 – 2695 – 2691 – 2685 – 2684 – 2682 – 2674 – 2656 – 2653 – 2651 – 2649 – 2645 – 2497 – 2054 – 0091

• Relevant Evidence Pages
• - Proof For Tony O’Clery’s IP On QuickTopic
• - Tony O’Clery’s Fake Names On QuickTopic
• - Tony O’Clery’s Sick Rape Claim On QuickTopic

QuickTopic Deception By Sanjay Dadlani:
Moreno discovered Sanjay Dadlani’s onetel IP through his own website when he traced it to several of his kinky, deviant and perverted blogs, including his StreetBitches Blog. Needless to say, Dadlani also posted his pic on his Gaurasundara’s Blog and it links to his onetel ISP website.

Under his user-name of “Sai Baba EXPOSED”, Dadlani posted under the IP ranges 212.85, 158.94 and 213.78 on the QuickTopic Board and used the following fake names:

1. James
2. bandbox3
3. bandbox2
4. Marquis de Sade
5. Sathya Sai Baba
6. Swami says
7. Jehosaphat
8. Bhivash
9. Somasundaram
10. Om Sai
11. Josephine Kabutla
12. edward
13. Agnes Wiggsbottom
14. kick his head in

2808 – 2793 – 2776 – 2763 – 2605 – 2570 – 2547 – 2501 – 2360 – 2358 – 2356 – 2348 – 2345 – 2329 – 2303 – 2295 – 2288 – 2271 – 2238 – 2236 – 2231 – 2198 – 1839 – 1530 – 1164 – 0730 – 0645 – 0643 – 0642 – 0640 – 0639 – 0637 – 0626 – 0622 – 0613 – 0611 – 0420

• Relevant Evidence Pages
• - Proof For Sanjay Dadlani’s 3 IPs On QuickTopic
• - Sanjay Dadlani’s Fake Names On QuickTopic
• - Sanjay Dadlani’s Violent And Gay Slurs On QuickTopic
• - Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘Marquis De Sade’ On QuickTopic
• - Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘Om Sai’ On QuickTopic
• - Sanjay Dadlani Posted As Females On QuickTopic
• - Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘James’ On QuickTopic
• - Sanjay Dadlani Posted As ‘Edward’ On QuickTopic
• - Ascertaining Sanjay Dadlani’s Proxy IP On QuickTopic

QuickTopic Deception From The ’saibabaexpose’ Website:
Anti-Sai Activists falsely attributed a QuickTopic post to Moreno that he did not make. They also selectively edited Moreno’s comments without providing links to his actual posts.

• Relevant Evidence Page
• - QuickTopic Posts And The ’saibabaexpose’ Lie Against Joe Moreno

QuickTopic Deception From Robert Priddy:
Robert Priddy posted under the IP range 84.208 on the QuickTopic Board and used the following fake names:

1. Lisa demoniser
2. bandbox

2970 – 2788 – 0143

Robert Priddy made anonymous posts on the QuickTopic Board and attempted to spam it with links to Anti-Sai websites.

• Relevant Evidence Page
• - Robert Priddy Posted As ‘Bandbox’ And ‘Lisa Demoniser’ On QuickTopic

QuickTopic Deception By UsedByBaba:
UsedByBaba posted under 7 IPs with the ranges 59.92, 59.144, 61.11, 61.17, 210.211, 221.134 and 202.43 on the QuickTopic Board and used the following fake names:

1. abused for15years
2. Anand krishnamurhti
3. Angel
4. Angelic
5. Angeilc
6. Anonymus
7. baba
8. balarama
9. Barbara Dent
10. blldexter
11. CO2000*
12. CO2OOO
13. CO2000
14. From CNN IBN
15. Jedgar
16. Joe
17. Joe 108
18. joe 108
19. Joe Moreno
20. Juan
21. lalu_panju (usedbybaba)
22. lalupanju
23. lenin999@yahoo.co.uk
24. Lisa
25. Lisa,,with joe108
26. Meera
27. Meera Powar
28. raghav
29. sai baba
30. Sathya Sai Baba
31. sathyasaibaba
32. Simon
33. Simonbrace
34. Simon Brace
35. Someonenew
36. Susan Olorenshaw (a person not involved with the Sai Controversy)
37. The Real Truth Seeker
38. Truth Seeker
39. USB
40. USEDBYBABA
41. usedbylallupanju
42. usedbylalupanju
43. unknownstudent
44. V.Prahaladh

2953 – 2952 – 2951 – 2950 – 2949 – 2948 – 2947 – 2946 – 2945 – 2944 – 2943 – 2940 – 2939 – 2935 – 2934 – 2923 – 2922 – 2921 – 2915 – 2914 – 2886 – 2882 – 2880 – 2872 – 2871 – 2830 – 2826 – 2825 – 2824 – 2823 – 2822 – 2821 – 2820 – 2805 – 2804 – 2802 – 2800 – 2798 – 2796 – 2772 – 2766 – 2753 – 2752 – 2751 – 2750 – 2707 – 2706 – 2705 – 2692 – 2688 – 2677 – 2668 – 2666 – 2664 – 2662 – 2661 – 2659 – 2650 – 2647 – 2646 – 2642 – 2627 – 2625 – 2624 – 2623 – 2609 – 2607 – 2557 – 2383 – 2372 – 2354 – 2338 – 2331 – 2330 – 2314 – 2304 – 2300 – 2299 – 2290 – 2289 – 2282 – 2281 – 2280 – 2279 – 2278 – 2277 – 2275 – 2262 – 2260 – 2259 – 2258 – 2257 – 2256 – 2255 – 2248 – 2247 – 2245 – 2244 – 2243 – 2242 – 2185 – 2184 – 2183 – 2181 – 2180 – 2158 – 2063 – 2053 – 2011 – 1861 – 1837 – 1836 – 1748 – 1739 – 1738 – 1736 – 1732 – 1731 – 1729 – 1725 – 1723 – 1722 – 1719 – 1713 – 1711 – 1710 – 1706 – 1704 – 1702 – 1699 – 1696 – 1695 – 1694 – 1692 – 1691 – 1689 – 1688 – 1686 – 1685 – 1684 – 1676 – 1675 – 1655 – 1636 – 1635 – 1632 – 1629 – 1628 – 1627 – 1622 – 1620 – 1619 – 1609 – 1607 – 1606 – 1605 – 1602 – 1601 – 1584 – 1582 – 1579 – 1578 – 1556 – 1553 – 1551 – 0933 – 0919 – 0918 – 0868 – 0827 – 0461 – 0460 – 0422 – 0417 – 0415 – 0413 – 0331 – 0329 – 0328 – 0326 – 0321 – 0319 – 0317 – 0316 – 0314 – 0311 – 0265 – 0257 – 0256

• Relevant Evidence Pages
• - Proof For UsedByBaba’s Multiple IPs On QuickTopic
• UsedByBaba’s Fake Names On QuickTopic:
  → Page01 → Page 02 → Page 03 → Page 04

QuickTopic Defamations By Barbara Dent:
Barbara Dent posted under the IP ranges 4.242 and 4.255 on the QuickTopic Board and used the following names:

1. Barbara
2. Barbara Dent
3. Carolyn/KickBaabaaa’ass
4. Carolyn/KickBaabaaa’butt
5. Barbara the Barbarian
6. Amen
7. Kickbaabaa’s Ass
8. Mother Bear
9. Carolyn

References From QuickTopic Board FE68KidtskS
2063 – 1961 – 1958 – 1956 – 1954 – 1951 – 1949 – 1947 – 1944 – 1936 – 1935 – 1934 – 1933 – 1913 – 1912 – 1911 – 1884 – 1870 – 1869 – 1868 – 1857 – 1810 – 1261 – 1215 – 1187 – 1169 – 1167 – 1158 – 1157 – 1154 – 1128 – 1096 – 1095 – 1093 – 1092 – 1089 – 1087 – 1079 – 1073 – 1040 – 1039 – 1009 – 978 – 972 – 970 – 900 – 888 – 865 – 873 – 872

• Relevant Evidence Pages
• - Proof For Barbara Dent’s 2 IPs On QuickTopic
• - Barbara Dent: Christian Whacko Attacking Sathya Sai Baba

Barry Pittard is the self-professed “international coordinator in attempts to bring Sai Baba to justice” and is the founder of the bogus “global coalition” F.D.S.S.B.. His sidekick is the Anti-Sai Extremist from Oslo Norway, Robert Priddy. Although Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy have thrust themselves into the limelight as being the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement, they purposely suppress the fact that they explicitly, unabashedly and wholly endorse, promote and associate themselves with proven and known perverts, sexual deviants and pathological liars.

The following screen-caps show how both Pittard & Priddy solicit Sanjay Dadlani’s “Sai Baba EXPOSED” blog on their wordpress.com accounts (click on thumbnails to enlarge):

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy see absolutely nothing wrong with Sanjay Dadlani’s homosexual-fantasizing slurs, Jesus Sex Fetish and Boot Sex Fetish. Although Sanjay went around secretly stalking innocent women (calling them “bitches” and “sluts”, saying “they want it”, calling Mothers “MILFs”, photographing females and teenagers up their dresses and under tables and publishing these photos on his streetbitches blog), Barry and Robert are right there holding hands with Sanjay. Shame on Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy!

Sanjay even posted on the QuickTopic Forum (using multiple fake names, including female names) and made disgusting comments under the name “Marquis de Sade”, even duplicating a post about a Priest ejaculating on the face of a little girl, as related by her brother. Sanjay even posted under the name “kick his head in” and said that someone should murder Sathya Sai Baba (of course, this is the same guy who rejoiced when a Sai Baba temple was bombed). Nice friend you have there, Barry & Robert.

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy are fully aware of Reinier van der Sandt’s very disturbing admission to viewing child pornography. Barry and Robert purposely ignore the fact that Reinier used numerous fake names on the SSB2 Yahoo Group and hold hands with him as well (as can be seen with their association with him through the exbaba website).

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy defend, promote and endorse perverts, defamers and liars. What does this say about Barry & Robert? I think the answer is self-evident. As they say, “Birds of feather flock together”.

Exposing Martin Alan Kazlev, webmaster for Kheper.net, the biased Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba sympathizer.

Alan Kazlev makes such poorly researched arguments against me, I consider them utterly ridiculous. Nevertheless, to show how poorly Kazlev makes his arguments against me (and to reveal his bias) I will respond to some of his erroneous comments (made on Wikipedia) against me. These comments came from several discussions had on Robert Priddy’s Wikipedia talk-page:

Alan Kazlev: btw Joe you make a false analogy. SSB is a public figure, and hence should be able to be criticised like any other well-known public figure. But Robert Priddy is in comparison a little-known writer, hence a great big long personal page dedicated to slandering him constitutes an ad homimen attack.

Obviously, Alan Kazlev is trying to re-define the word “slander” to suit whatever agenda he is trying to push. Slander is a spoken false statement injurious to a person’s reputation. If something is negative, but true, that is not “slander”. Anti-Sai Activists loosely use words like “slander”, “defamation”, “pedophilia”, “boys”, etc.

Alan Kazlev is flat out wrong about Robert Priddy. Priddy listed himself as a public figure on Wikipedia and has written hundreds of articles against Sathya Sai Baba. It is nothing less than sheer absurdity for Kazlev to claim that Priddy should not be criticized because he is a “little-known writer”. For Alan’s information, Priddy happens to be one of the most verbose writers against Sathya Sai Baba. Therefore, a critical analysis of Priddy’s claims, assertions, speculations and conspiracy theories is entirely and wholly justified (unless you happen to live in a communist country where free speech is not allowed).

What is ironic about all this is that Kazlev not only created “big long personal pages dedicated to slandering” me (which, of course, constitute “ad hominem attacks”) he also pretended to be a psychiatrist and implied I have mental disorders such as “obsessive-compulsive personality disorder” (aka OCPD or anankastic personality disorder), “projection of the ego” and “projection of the shadow”. Alan Kazlev has no credentials in the mental health or medical fields whatosever. Kazlev should stick to what he knows best: philosophizing and skimming over other’s research.

In my opinion, Alan Kazlev is a hypocrite. I assume Alan will now try to accuse me of “slandering” him because I called him a “hypocrite”. Fortunately, I live in the USA where we have freedom of speech and where people are entitled to have personal opinions. My opinion is that Alan is a hypocrite based on his contradictory actions and words. Examples: 1) Ranting about creating long pages against Priddy, but then turning around and doing the same thing to me and 2) Whining about “ad hominem attacks” and “slander” and then implying I have mental disorders. This type of behavior, in layman’s terms, is called “hypocrisy” and Alan suffers from it.

Alan Kazlev: As for your claims Joe, Robert Priddy’s websites are not, “full of ad hominem attacks against Sai Baba” as far as I understand the term. Which statements are you referring by Priddy which are genuine ad hominem arguments, if we define argumentum ad hominem as trying to discredit a statement by referring to an unrelated fault in the character of the person who made the statement, as you have repeatedly done against SSB critics (not just Robert Priddy but others as well). That is why I refer to your actions as slander (even if you don’t think that term applies to you). To prove someone is a liar for example one must be able to show that the person has intentionally stated an untruth knowing it to be untrue. Therefore you are defaming Priddy, while I cannot see that he has defaming you in this (or any other) way. I would also be interested if you could provide direct references with a link to anywhere that Priddy has posted anything where he actually calls you, personally, a liar or has defamed you.

Alan Kazlev: Joe you still in my opinion have presented no convincing evidence and have not shown that Robert defames you nor that he calls you a liar anywhere, which you do of him on innumerable occasions and without credible evidence. It seems to me that for you, a liar is virtually anyone who questions Sathya Sai Baba, and makes any statement that you find fault with, often because they will not entrust you with sensitive information. The link to the comments about you on Priddy’s webpages do not show any defamation of your character there, Certainly nothing more serious than you have written about me, for example (regarding which (from what i have seen) I have no complaints).

On This Webpage, Priddy said about me: “He widely propagates lies and slanders and the wildest kinds of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba…” Therefore, Priddy called me a liar. There is your link, Kazlev. As one can see, Kazlev just sits back on his rump, makes alls sorts of demands and does not even lift one finger to do the research himself. Kazlev expects others to spoon-feed him links, comments and references because he is a lazy armchair critic. After supplying Kazlev with links, comments and references, he ignores them if they do not argue in his favor.

I have responded to what I consider Priddy’s libelous comments against me on the following posts:

* Defamatory Attack One: Response 1
* Defamatory Attack One: Response 2
* Defamatory Attack One: Response 3

Even after spoon-feeding Kazlev with Priddy documented lies on Wikipedia, he totally ignored them. See the following documented lies from Robert Priddy on Wikipedia:

* Robert Priddy’s Phony “Phone” Lies
* Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
* Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
* Say What?
* Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
* Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
* Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
* A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
* Another Example Of Priddy’s Poor Research

And let us not forget Priddy’s vicious lie about Joy Thomas (not related to Wikipedia):

* Priddy’s Shameless Lie About Joy Thomas

All the information that Kazlev demands is right there under his nose. Kazlev is up to his neck in water and cries out he is thirsty. There is no satsifying a “skimmer” who admitted he does not have the “time”, “patience” or “inclination” to research my claims.

Alan Kazlev: As for the anonymity claim (Robert says you are, you say you aren’t), well, honestly, it makes no difference to me personally whether you are or want to be anonymous, or whether you are who you say you are (as long as you don’t slander others). On your page you make Robert out to be a liar for saying all this. But regarding this, Robert informed me that: “In a mail to Conny Larsson, he shows how Moreno used the IP 192.168.9.27 (PRIVATE no source available). This proves outright that he uses proxy IPs. This makes it impossible to prove definitively that he really is the author (as someone else could fake the mail content etc.)… not without a costly subpoena process. So what IS his real IP and why doesn’t he give his details?”

I’ve already discussed this issue in depth with Kazlev, which forced Priddy to update his article (although it did not do any good because Priddy still continued with his pathological and wholly unsupported lies against me). Click Here to view my article about Conny Larsson’s deception regarding my IP. I fully responded to this issue on my blogged post: Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3

Alan Kazlev: You like to advertise Robert Priddy’s IP on your own website and also on Wikipedia, but it is not hidden, neither is his address, phone number or publications. Similarily I am open about my dealings, i use my real name on wikipedia, not a username, so people know it is me. If you want to private and secretive, that is fine, I have no problems with that, but don’t then claim that those who report this are liars, or use your anonymity as a cloak to attack others. It does you no credit and undercuts what credibility you may otherwise have.

First of all, Kazlev needs to tell me where I “advertise Robert Priddy’s IP” anywhere on my site? I am not aware of having done so, nor can I find any reference to it. Priddy’s IP on Wikipedia is not “advertised” by me. It is advertised by Priddy himself because his IP is there next to any edits or comments he makes. My IP is also on Wikipedia. I have nothing to hide and never have.

Also, we do not know if Kazlev is truly being forthcoming about his identity or personal information. After all, Kazlev admitted that he changed his name (at least) twice. Furthermore, Kazlev does not provide his full name, full address or full phone number on his site. This must mean (using Priddy and Anti-Sai Activist’s standards) that he is not who he claims he is and is using a fake identity. Too bad Kazlev cannot live up to the same standards he defends Anti-Sai Activists for using against me. Also, Priddy openly refused to divulge his phone number because he didn’t want “unwanted disturbances”. Priddy has two addresses listed on Anti-Sai Sites and no one knows whether they are genuine, fake or outdated. In other words, Priddy fails to divulge the same contact details he demands from me. Priddy also fails to demand the same contact details from Kazlev that he demands from me. Hypocrisy, clear and simple.

Alan Kazlev: What is worse are the double standards. While guarding your own privacy so carefully, you make all sorts of allegations about ex-devotees, including slurs and inuendos regarding their private lives, as well as outright and blatant lies; e.g. they are paedophiles, pornographers, associate with white supremacists, etc etc.

Anti-Sai Activists are to blame for making their private lives available on the internet. Anti-Sai Activists have showed no compassion for the “private lives” of Sai Devotees and Proponents. Kazlev would have known this had he researched the matter. Unfortunately, Kazlev told me (several times) that he has not researched this matter because he does not have the “time”, “patience” or “inclination” to do so! The fact of the matter is that I have found shocking information that wholly undermines the alleged integrity and crediblity of Anti-Sai Activists. This is a fact and I have proof to back it up.

I never called anyone a “pedophile” or an “associate with white supremacists”. Alan is being untruthful. Reinier Van Der Sandt admitted, out of his own mouth that:

Reinier Van Der Sant: “I found lots of kiddy porno-sites with very much child porn pics, but…, but… it was impossible for me to watch it for very long, because when I was clicking on an image to enlarge, other pages were popping up so fast on my computer screen, that I could not open such a site, in fact, all kiddy porno sites – as what I have seen of it – have multi pop up techniques, which makes it difficult for the kiddy porno watcher to watch easily…Only in the opening pages I saw some kiddy porn, when I wanted to continue and see more, I had to suscribe and/or pay…Internet kiddy porno can be obtained, I have to correct myself on what I was previously writing on this board, I have been looking for kiddy porn on the internet – NOT AS A CUSTOMER, BUT BECAUSE I WANTED TO FIND OUT WHETHER ONE CAN OBTAIN EASILY FILTHY KIDDIE PORNO!!!” (Refs: Original – Duplicate)

As one can see, my concern about Reinier’s viewing of child pornogrpahy is entirely warranted. I challenge any parent to tell me otherwise. After reading these shocking comments from Reinier, I rightly expressed concern over pictures he took of a child sucking on a popsicle. Strange enough, Kazlev agreed with me.

As a matter of fact, Kazlev skimmed through some yahoo posts where Reinier was using the name “sloppyjoemoreno” and said (verbatim): “is it Reinier using your name? i tell you, glancing through those yahoo posts, it seems like this guy and his buddy Sai Exposed are a bunch of adolescent fuckheads”. “Sai Exposed” is Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (the guy who Alan now defends). Kazlev also said of Reinier: “yep, he is one sick character alright… (the more one reads on all this, the dirtier one feels…ughh! Like swimming in a sewer)…i have to admit, the more i look into this guy the less i like him”. Kazlev is now defending Reinier as well (talk about a flip-flopper).

When I emailed Kazlev about his erroneous claim that I accused Anti-Sai Activists of being “associated with White Supremacits”, he responded by saying that I accused Barry Pittard with being “associated with White Supremacists” (a bold-faced and unscrupulous lie). It is exactly this type of poor research and inaccurate paraphrasing that wholly compromises Kazlev’s integrity. These serious and inaccurate mistakes also support my contention that Kazlev “skims” through information and makes stuff up to suit whatever agenda he is trying to push. When it come down to the cold, hard facts, Kazlev is clueless and cannot factually support his comments with actual references taken in context.

Alan Kazlev: You claim “Robert Priddy is relating more scurrilous fabrications and gutter untruths against me under the guise of anonymity.” But where is the proof of these assertions?

Here is the webpage in question. One will notice that this page is without a signature, is unattributed and does not have any external links. Therefore, it is anonymous. In it’s original form, it was first published anonymously on the “angeltowns2.net/tanik” domain. After it was deleted for defamatory content by AngelTowns2 (I reported it), Priddy then moved the article to the exbaba site where it was deleted and again moved to his chello.no site. Priddy then duplicated it to his home.no.net/abacusa site where it remains to this day unsigned and unattributed. There is your proof Kazlev. What’s the problem? Don’t have the “time”, “patience” or “inclination” to read my site and do the research for your yourself? I didn’t think so.

Alan Kazlev: You wrote “Priddy’s dirty and filthy websites”. You use of such language is imho just more examples of slander (and more shadow projection) on your part.

This was already discussed on my Priddy’s Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites blogged article. Kazlev confuses personal opinion with “slander”. If Kazlev doesn’t like personal opinions, he should live alone and try to avoid people as much as possible. Oh yeah, he already does that (with a self-admission)!

Alan Kazlev: To cite another example, you posted the slander of Dr. Leo Rebello against Priddy on your website. That is an implicit endorsement of Rebello’s statements and is I understand slanderous by law.

This is another poorly researched response from Kazlev. Where exactly did I get Rebello’s “slander” from in the first place? I got it from Priddy’s AngelTowns site! That’s right, Priddy published all of Rebello’s “slanderous” emails on a website that AngelTowns deleted for defamatory content. The site was online for almost a full year! Here is Rebello’s complaint to AngelTowns against Priddy. As I stated before, I believe it is true that Rebello defamed Priddy and vice-versa. The only difference in their defamation war was that Rebello did not create a website defaming Priddy (whereas Priddy created a website defaming Rebello). And yes, the website belonged to Priddy. As a matter of fact, Priddy’s past comment about Rebello (in which he claimed the AngelTowns site as his) can still be viewed online: Reference.

Alan Kazlev: Your allegations about Priddy on porn sites are unverified, and hence defamatory and slanderous. How do we know that someone (I wonder who?) has used his website title in signing up for those sites?

This is another poorly-researched comment from Kazlev. I already blogged about this issue in my article Priddy’s Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites. I screen-captures 4 google pages containing 7 sexually explicit sites that listed Priddy’s webpage. Even Lisa saw these sites when they were up. Kazlev’s claim that my allegations are “unverified” is untrue. Therefore, it is not “slander” as he contends.

Alan Kazlev: You also say things like “Heil Priddy” and other similar slanderous language.

I said “Heil Priddy” because Priddy demanded that I divulge my full name, full address and full phone number (that he already has) or I am not who I say I am. However, when it came to Barry Pittard, Priddy said about his address, “one which any citizen has a right to keep private if he or she wishes”. Therefore, I had a reason for saying what I did. I pointed out Priddy’s double-standards and equivocation (Ref: See Last Post). Priddy demands one standard from me, yet exempts Anti-Sai Activists from the same standard. This is cultish, hypocritical and dictatorial. Therefore, my comment (“Heil Priddy”) is not “slander”. It is a personal sentiment used to highlight what I perceived to be a valid point.

Alan Kazlev: But where is the reference that Robert Priddy thinks this is justified? You try to smear him simply by his association with others whose statements and acts he is not responsible for. And what i find really emotionally immature is the way you try to ridicule him by using a ridiculous nickname, which to me shows only a spiteful attitude on your part. I have already mentioned on my website your use of this name to mock and ridicule. So haw can you claim respectability when you act like that?

This is yet another poorly-researched comment from Kazlev. Priddy accused me of posting images of a “pornographic kind” on my website, yet never complained about images of a “pornographic kind” published by Reinier Van Der Sandt and Sanjay Dadlani. The images I published were anonymously sent to me by “Premaperm”. Since Priddy “smeared” me “by association”, why can’t I use the same standard with him? Kazlev demands a certain standard from me, yet cares less about the standards used by Priddy and Anti-Sai Activists. This points to Kazlev’s bias and partisonship and where his loyalty lies.

Over the course of a year, Kazlev also accused me several times of using a “ridiculous nickname”, being “emotionally immature”, being “spiteful”, employing “mock and ridicule” and having “adolescent childishness” for referring to Priddy as “Priddles”. Kazlev (caring less for facts and more for judgmentalism) resorted to ad hominem attacks without even checking his facts. “Priddles” is a known name of Priddy’s (that he divulged on former webpages, which have since been deleted). Only after repeating myself a couple of times did Kazlev finally confirm this fact with Priddy himself. Needless to say, Kazlev then changed his argument against me and then accused me for using a childhood name of Priddy. Kazlev was shamed once again for his poor research and tried to escape responsiblity by blaming me by using a different argument.

Alan Kazlev: You also make many unsupported assumptions and statements, for example, “I fully know the depth of corruption and decay prevalent among Anti-Sai Activists (Robert Priddy included).” This emotionalistic statement is again slanderous.

Alan is once again confusing personal opinion with “slander”. I am perfectly entitled to my opinion about Robert Priddy, based on my research into his accusations (research Kazlev admitted he has never conducted himself). This statement, from Kazlev, is a perfect example on how he tries to twist “personal opinion” into “slander”. If Alan does not like for others to have personal opinions, he should move to a communist country.

WIKIPEDIA REFERENCES:
Wikipedia References For This Article (read sections in green):
01 – 02 – 03

Reference

Exposing Martin Alan Kazlev, webmaster for Kheper.net, the biased Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba sympathizer.

It should come as no surprise that Alan Kazlev is not only a friend to Sanjay Kishore Dadlani, he also promotes, endorses and solicits Sanjay’s defamatory blogs against Sathya Sai Baba and me. This from a guy who claims he is honest, truthful and does not believe in “slander”.

Alan Kazlev is fully aware (and does not care) that Sanjay Dadlani has been fully exposed for his StreetBitches Blog, his Jesus Sex Fetish, his views on Child And Teen Pornography, his self-admitted Psychological Problems, his Disturbing Views About Women, his self-admitted Drinking Problems, his Satanic Inclinations, his Shocking Confessions, his Long And Established History As A Pathological Liar, his outward Denial Of His Own Hare Krishna Guru – Srila Prabhupada, his public Lie About Meeting Aghori Vimalananda, his Homoeroticism And Gender Confusion, his Inability To Keep A Girlfriend, his Pseudo-Devotee Posturing, his He-Man Inspired God Concept, his Lies About Being A Vegetarian, his weird claim that He Was Dying, his amusing Belief That Semen Can Be Sucked Up From The Testicles, Via The Spine, To The Brain and his Suicidal And Self-Injurious Statements.

When I emailed Alan about a claim that Sanjay indirectly attributed to him, I brought up Sanjay’s Jesus sex-fetish and Alan responded by saying:

So what? What’s the big deal? It’s no different to nurses uniforms (Reference)

When I discussed Sanjay’s pathological lies, ad hominem attacks and his racist, misogynistic, deviant, boot fetish and sleazy posts on his former killuminati blog, Alan responded by saying:

I have corresponded with him and my opinion of him is quite different And what’s with this trip about sleaziness and fetishes? Are you some sort of moral guardian? (Reference)

Alan Kazlev thinks there is absolutely nothing wrong with racist and misogynistic comments.

Alan Kazlev thinks there is absolutely nothing wrong with Sanjay’s pathological lies.

Alan Kazlev thinks there is absolutely nothing wrong with Sanjay’s criminal behavior of stalking innocent teenagers, mothers and female Middlesex University students (in which he secretly took pictures up their dresses and under tables, labeled them “sluts” and “bitches” and posted over 300 sleazy pictures on a private blog along with illegal teen porn links)! Sanjay’s behavior was even discovered by a good friend of his, whom Sanjay praised and eulogized on his Gaurasundra Blog.

*“No different to nurses uniforms”?
*“Are you some sort of moral guardian?”
These are the casual, unconcerned comments from someone who professes an admiration for honesty, spirituality and “integral transformation”. Pathetic.

Alan Kazlev cares very little for the truth and rather have biased Anti-Sai Activists fill him in on their version of the “truth”. When it comes to my version of the truth, Alan does not have the “time”, “patience” or “inclination” to hear or research it!

Funny enough, Sanjay recently posted on his blog:

Sensible and rational people who are logical and down-to-earth do not believe in things like reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materialisations and the like.

That’s right, “sensible”, “rational”, “logical” or “down-to-earth” people cannot believe Alan Kazlev because he believes in reincarnation, spirit possession, miraculous materializations and the like (including UFO’s, aliens, alternate realities, cosmic redemption, planetary Buddhas, genuine avataric gurus, psychic powers, devas, Earth spirits, elementals, the occult and kundalini).

What more to say about these Anti-Sai nutters and sympathizers? They are a bunch of weirdo’s who not only contradict themselves, they contract each other.

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay Dadlani recently wrote an article about Sathya Sai Baba and Dvaita Vedanta that said, in part:

“It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Sai Baba also claims to be a poorna avatar. Of course, nothing else would be appropriate enough to describe his great magnificence. :-) Sai Baba’s ‘poorna’ status is supposed to be exemplified via the sensational nature of his “astounding miracles”, welfare works, all-inclusive spiritual teachings, and the like. After all, wouldn’t GOD be perfectly capable of transmitting new holy teachings for the benefit of the world, which explain absolutely everything?

Here comes the crunch: Dvaita Vedanta is one of the three major philosophical schools of Hindu theology, the other two being Vishishtadvaita Vedanta and Advaita Vedanta. Whereas seekers of Eastern spirituality are likely to have heard of or be influenced by Advaita above all, Dvaita (also known as Tattvavada) has an increasing reputation for having formed its conclusions on a strong basis of sound reasoning, admirable rigorousness and textual clarity. In other words, Dvaita followers have extremely good reasons for believing the way they do, and Dvaita holds that there is no such thing as poorna avatars. :-)

The reason for this is rather simple: Since avatars are descents of one deity, Vishnu, it naturally follows that they are all emanations of his and would naturally possess all of his potencies. In theory, it is possible for Matsya and other “minor” avatars to exhibit and fully display all the astounding powers of God displayed by the ‘poornas’ like Rama and Krishna, and the reason for why they didn’t do so is really because there was no call to do so. Otherwise it is regarded that each and every incarnation of Vishnu is possessed of ‘full’ and ‘complete’ power and are thus equal to each other. There is no gradation among the incarnations of Vishnu as they are all him.

Not everyone will agree with this, but there you have it: the viewpoint of Dvaita Vedanta on this subject. This leads us to the natural consequence that Sathya Sai Baba’s claims to ‘poorna’ avatarhood will have no credibility among the followers of Dvaita Vedanta and they are not likely to brook such nonsense either.

At the very least, this is a perfect example of how Sathya Sai Baba’s divine and supposedly all-inclusive teachings are incompatible with Dvaita Vedanta philosophy. :-) One of the Baba’s oft-quoted platitudes urges Hindus to be better Hindus, Christians to be better Christians, Muslims to be better Muslims, and so on. This will not apply for the Dvaita Vedantin, as Sai Baba’s meaningless witterings about ‘poorna’ avatars will hold no weight with such people. After all, how can Sai Baba claim anything “special” about his status when his claim doesn’t even exist in their religious paradigm? :-)”

Well the real “crunch” about Sanjay’s useless and pointless article is that Dvaita Vedanta is not accepted by Christianity, Islam, Agnosticism, Atheism, Buddhism, Chinese traditional religions, Primal indigenous religions, African tradional and diasporic religions, Sikhism, Judaism, Rastafarianism, etc.

Dvaita Vedanta forms an extremely small percentage of religious adherents and their God Concept is rather meaningless in the overall schema of religious beliefs. Turning the tables, Dvaita Vedantin’s God Concept is meaningless and holds no weight to the majority of religious/non-religious adherents that populate the Earth. How can Dvaita Vedantins claim anything special about Vishnu when their claims do not even exist in the majority paradigms that religious/non-religious people happen to believe in? Needless to say, the majority religions would not brook such nonsense either :-)

Furthermore, Gaudiya Vaishnavism (which Sanjay fully professes belief in) fully advocates for the concept of Poorna Avatars and a special emphasis is always placed on Radha-Krishna. Krishna is considered the fullest and Original Personality of Godhead, with whom other avatars simply do not compare. Needless to say, Sanjay’s Gaudiya Vaishnava beliefs in the Supreme Personality of Godhead and that Lord Krishna is the source of Vishnu (and not an incarnation of Him) have no credibility among followers of Dvaita Vedanata (who believe that Vishnu is the Supreme Being and Lord Krishna was an incarnation of Him and not vice versa).

Therefore, Sanjay Dadlani just formed another argument against his own Gaudiya Vaishnava beliefs. The only time Sanjay opens his mouth is to stick his other foot in it. Since Sanjay Dadlani believes that Dvaita Vedanta “forms its conclusions on a strong basis of sound reasoning, admirable rigorousness and textual clarity”, I suggest he approach the Bhaktivedanta Manor in the UK (which he attends and whose marble deities he bows before as God Incarnate) and tell them to replace the statues of RadhaKrishna and Ramachandra with one of Vishnu because Dvaita Vedantins worship Vishnu as the Supreme Being and their beliefs are somehow meritorious and are based on sound reasoning, admirable rigorousness and textual clarity. lol

To top off all this nonsense, Sanjay Dadlani does not believe in Dvaita Vedanta per se. The Sutras of Vyasa are the basis of Vedanta philosophy. These Sutras have been commented on by various scholars/devotees and various interpretations have given rise to several schools of thought. For example:

1. Kevala Advaita philosophy of Sri Sankaracharya
2. The philosophy of Qualified Monism or Visishtadvaita of Sri Ramanuja
3. Dvaita philosophy of Sri Madhvacharya
4. The Bhedabheda philosophy of Sri Nimbarkacharya
5. The Suddha Advaita philosophy of Sri Vallabhacharya
6. The Achintya Bhedabheda philosophy of Sri Chaitanya
7. The Siddhanta philosophy of Sri Meykandar

Apparently, Sanjay has a lot of time on his hands (since his University put a stop to his boot fetish stalking habits) and decided to bore everyone with his pointless philosophical nonsense.

It worked.

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

DIRECT FROM SANJAY’S FORMER KILLUMINATI BLOG: DUPLICATED VERBATIM (vowels in the profanity have been replaced with “*’s” by me):

I guess I can just envision myself hooking up with some cute little b*tch and then messing up her head in the worst way possible, leaving her all f*cked-up and broken-hearted. That’s almost satanic and is something that I could normally never do, but these days I just don’t seem to care.

F*cking b*tches, they owe me something. And every day that passes ain’t helping their f*cking case. Oh boy, am I getting madder and madder by the day. Oh boy, am I gonna burn them alive or what? They all f*cking try this sh*t with me. As if I’sm some kinda lame dog or something that’ll let it go. Ooh, hell no! I am NOT gonna be letting this sh*t go, especially from f*cking nervous cowards who ain’t even got the guts to come and face me.

F*cking women, I decided today that I think all “hot” women f*cking can go f*ck themselves. F*cking snotty b*tches, f*cking little teasers, they can go die. Little b*tches, brought up as sluts. f*cking sh*tty females, my ass. They can go die.

F*cking women, they’re all on the same side. No wonder they think differently, they’re a totally different species! They reckon all guys are bad and so they must all get in a closed-off group and protect each other. F*cking bollocks. Of course it’s ALWAYS the guy’s fault, even when they guy hasn’t done anything at all except give away their soul. Well f*ck that.

Women as a whole are really starting to piss me off. Why don’t they just go and f*ck off? You either get “hot” women who prance about thinking that they’re all that and how incredibly lucky you are to even be in their presence, or you get the ugly b*tches whose tongues hang out for you all over the floor.

She can go to hell and she can go f*ck herself. I have better things to do than be distracted by women who haven’t a f*cking clue what they want. It’s be SO f*cking easy to just get into a no-strings thing with someone, if only I could find someone. But hey, that’ll come with time.

Usually I treat girls like the f*cking sluts that they ARE.

But, in any case, just look at the lame horny sluts that I have after me; there’s Redhead Anna, there’s Miss PAraguay and so many promiscuous f*ck swho if I’d sleep with I’d probably pick up some unknown STD. So why should I keep crying over HER and miss HER when I have so many f*cking SLUTS to enjoy with?

And to top it all off, Sanjay Dadlani went around Middlesex University stalking innocent students and photographed them up their dresses and under tables and posted the pictures on his StreetBitches Blog
This is the disgusting pervert that Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard and Anti-Sai Activists praise, promote and defend. Speaks volumes about those opposing Sathya Sai Baba.

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

On February 23rd, two anonymous posts were made about me on the QuickTopic forum that stated:

Sathya Sai Baba: “It’s about time Joe kept his regular 3 o’clock weekly appointment with me for his light refreshment. Oh how I love a bit of gay sex just before I go out for afternoon darshan and annoy people by not walking their way. The fools don’t know that I’m busy fucking Joe in his hot little asshole and riding him like a bastard screaming for more. And then I blow my load of hot cum down his throat and Joe says YUM YUM” Reference

Swami says: “Suck my wang, Joe!” Reference

Click On Thumbnail To Enlarge:

I immediately suspected that these posts were made by Sanjay Dadlani because he was the only Anti-Sai Activist who used the term “wang” before (in the same context) on the SSB2 Yahoo Group. Sanjay said:

“Sounds like you’re an idiot who thinks only clibacy is the way to self-realization. Good luck dumbass, especially since your guru certainly gets his wang played with every day. That’s a self-realised leela.” (Reference)

Sanjay also happened to use the exact term “Yum Yum” on his killuminati blog. Sanjay said:

“But anyway, here’s some tasty pictures of lead singer, Cristina Scabbia – the ultimate goth beauty. Yum yum.” (Reference)

Now that I have access to the QuickTopic IPs, I can confirm that the IPs to these posts match the ones that Dadlani used on the QuickTopic Forum (Reference). As a matter of fact, Sanjay Dadlani (using the name “Sai Baba EXPOSED”) posted under the 213.78 IP over a hundred times. The 213.78 IP also resolves directly to Sanjay Dadlani’s known Internet Service Provider (Onetel) in the UK.

As I have often said, these are the sexually focused deviants and perverts who are attempting to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba. They willfully, purposely and deceptively use numerous fake names and identities to defame Sai Baba, Sai devotees and Sai proponents. Sanjay Dadlani was previously exposed for his Jesus Sex Fetish and Boot Sex Fetish. Sanjay Dadlani has now been exposed once again for his graphic homosexual fantasies involving me having gay sex with Sathya Sai Baba and apparently relishing the imagery! Sanjay even posted under the name “Marquis de Sade” and submitted sexual quotes from 120 Days of Sodom (Ref: 01 – 02 – 03).

It should come as no surprise then that Sanjay Dadlani also made the following posts:

Kick his head in: “bastard sai baba” Reference

Kick his head in: “and kill him.” Reference

Click On Thumbnail To Enlarge:

Anti-Sai Activist’s make the case for me that they are a bunch of hateful, angry and vindictive people who wage vicious smear campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba. Ex-devotees used to boast “The Truth Will Prevail!” Well, the “truth” is prevailing and it’s not in their favor.

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

This entry is an update to my former articles: Sanjay Defending Sathya Sai Baba & Lord Krishna’s Inability To Protect His Devotees?

On the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group Sanjay said:

And damn right, I am so happy that SB temples are being bombed. This is SB’s own karma coming back to him. What a great God he is, he couldn’t even protect his own temple, what a magnificent avatar. I wonder if anyone actually died in the blast (Reference).

Regarding the bombing at the ISKCON temple, let me repeat my former argument (using Sanjay’s words) with a slight modification: What a great God Lord Krishna is: He couldn’t even protect his own temple and devotees on his birthday celebrations. What a magnificent avatar!

Sanjay himself argued that an avatar’s inability to protect his temple reveals the said avatar’s real power. Needless to say, Sanjay just made the perfect argument against his own chosen savior (Sri Krishna) that he made against Sathya Sai Baba.

Sanjay is making this way too easy for me.

Enough said!

Regarding The Bombing Near A Sai Baba Temple:
First and foremost, the bombing did not occur at a Sathya Sai Baba temple. It occurred near a famous Shirdi Sai Baba Temple in Dilsukhnagar (Reference).

Anti-Sai Activists have erroneously contended (as they often do) that the bombing occurred near a Sathya Sai Baba temple in Andhra Pradesh and made the following comments:

http://www.saiguru.net/english/news/021122birthday.htm
At the same time, Naxalites and Maoists continue a bombing campaign in Andhra Pradesh about which the world hears nothing. The Express Network reports on 22-11-02 : “One killed, 16 hurt in bomb temple blast” and “a bomb went off near the popular Sai Baba temple in the crowded Dilsukhnagar area” (see link 2 below). Could it be that not everyone loves SB, as he claims. Not even in his own State?

Fortunately, Gulam Yazdani, the man who committed this bombing (among other vicious attacks), was gunned down and stopped by the police (Reference).

Needless to say, Sanjay jumped onto the Anti-Sai bandwagon-of-deceit and rejoiced in the bombing, expressing his happiness, excitement and delight that a Sai temple was bombed and wondered if anyone was killed!

Sanjay is a sicko desperately in need of orthodox psychological help.

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Sanjay wrote an article against me in response to my blogged post entitled “Sanjay Rejoiced When Sai Baba Temples Bombed”.

Sanjay said the following:

“Moreno Rejoices, Makes Death Wish”
Now it looks as if Gerald Moreno has also joined the ranks of the fanatics who wish death on anyone with the remotest connection to former devotees and criticism of Sai Baba in general.Please see: Lisa De Witt: Lisa Bombs A Temple to familiarise yourself with the issues.

After doing that, take a look at Gerald Moreno’s posting where he “exposed” the alleged death wish and ended up making a death wish of his own!

Tough luck to Moreno. He considers it to be very “fortunate” that the instigator of the bombings was gunned down by the police, thus openly rejoicing over Yazdani’s death.

Macabre magoots, driving themselves bonkers over defending Sathya Sai Baba and creating a show of incredible public ridicule for themselves. This is what it means to be a devotee of Sai Baba: You Lose Your Mind.

Moreno is too far gone to benefit from help. I should know, I’m a Psychology student. :-)

Sanjay’s response is very troubling for several reasons.

To begin, I have never wished (nor do I wish) death on anyone belonging to the Anti-Sai group. It is very strange that Sanjay would express the view that a known terrorist had some kind of remote connection with Anti-Sai Activists. Does Sanjay know something we don’t? The terrorist whose death I expressed gratitude about was Gulam Yazdani. This is the same person whose death Sanjay said I wished upon “anyone with the remotest connection to former devotees”. Gee, I didn’t know Yadzani had a “remote connection” with Ex-Devotees.

Let me be perfectly clear about my opinion regarding terrorists who slaughter, rape, torture, persecute and terrorize innocent people without remorse, conscience or regard for human life: In my opinion, anyone (whether they be separatists, rebels, freedom fighters, liberators, revolutionaries, guerrillas, vigilantes, militants, mujaheddins, jihadis or fedayeens) who terrorize innocent people should be stopped by any and all means necessary, including being killed. I am not embarrassed or afraid to voice this opinion and I seriously doubt that there are many people who would disagree with me.

Apparently, Sanjay disagrees with me and actually sympathizes with terrorists and feels that terrorist’s lives are worth saving, even at the cost of jeopardizing many innocent lives to obtain theirs. Sanjay needs to get a grip on reality and awaken from his looney-tune world in which he thinks He-Man will save the day. Sanjay envisions the war against terrorism as an invasion where forces counter terrorist’s guns, bombs and rockets with pepper spray and paddles.

All of this is not surprising to me in the least. In my opinion, Sanjay is a budding terrorist in his own right. Not only did Sanjay Rejoice When A Sai Baba Temple Was Bombed, he also said he was “so happy” that it happened! What kind of person rejoices when terrorists plant bombs that kill and injure innocent people? What kind of person sympathizes with terrorists and criticizes others when they express gratitude that a vicious terrorist was stopped? I’ll tell you what kind of person: A sicko. A sicko who: has Satanic inclinations, fantasizes about cutting himself with razors and licking the barrel of a gun before blowing his brains out, admits he has deeply rooted psychological problems, wages his own Holy War, has a Jesus sex fetish, has a kinky and deviant boot fetish, admits he is full of poison and bitterness and is a chronic pathological liar.

Sanjay also provided a fake screencapture to my blog. His screencapture did not come from my blog. The screencapture does not have the color theme to my blog and it shows a full URL when full URLs are not displayed on my blog. Sanjay is using proxy servers to view my blog because he is afraid that I might trace more of his deviant online behavior, like I did with his former Killuminati Blog and StreetBitches Blog. Sanjay has much to hide and with good reason.