Robert Priddy’s Moon Madness

Referenced from robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/deceiving-devotee-makes-bogus-image-of-sai-in-the-moon/

Robert Priddy wrote a blogged article about a Sai Devotee he erroneously accused of making a “bogus image of Sai in the Moon”. The image in question is below:

Further sticking his foot in his mouth, Robert Priddy said:

“However, the falsifier who put together the deceptive image presented a completely circular moon. A wholly transparent fraudulence, in fact a wilful, and outright lie! Of course, had this occurred (except perhaps in the over-heated imagination of some devotees), it would have been global news story No. 1!”

Although Robert Priddy’s numerous lies have been fully documented and exposed by me, he continues to fraudulently and shamelessly lie about other unapologetically. This type of vicious behavior proves that Robert Priddy is mentally unstable and is in need of orthodox psychological help.

Since Robert Priddy (the alleged and self-professed “scholar”) is totally incapable of conducting even the most remedial and elementary or research, let me supply the general public with verifiable facts.

First of all, Darpan (the “Sai Devotee” referred to by Robert Priddy) fully admitted that the image was not real. Darpan said:

Sairam,Dear all,
this is not a real image, but im sending what i could see and visualise, what we all saw yesterday looking at the moon. there was not need to imagine a shape or make a guess the visual on moon was as clear as the image im sending now. HIS hair, eyes, nose and even HIS smile was very clear.Sairam,
enjoy! HIS blessings.
yours sincerley,
darpan (Reference)

Secondly, the SaiBabaOfIndia website linked the image directly to the post above. Click on the image for yourself (Reference). Anyone with any semblance of visual and mental acuity can see that the image in question is a composite and is not the Moon. Therefore, Robert Priddy’s entire article is based on lies and fradulent information that he never cared to research or verify for himself (which he can often be seen doing in relation to Sathya Sai Baba).

Robert Priddy loves to jump to the worst case conspiratorial view because he cares more for sensationalism and sleaze and cares less for accuracy and the truth.

Although Robert Priddy published Darpan’s email, he apparently never contacted him to get his facts right. Robert Priddy also published Darpan’s picture on his blog. What is strange about this is when I published Robert Priddy’s public-domain picture on my website (Reference), he whined and hissed that I violated his copyrights. Although Robert Priddy continues to whine and hiss about the publication of his picture on my website (and how it violates his copyrights), he published Darpan’s picture (without obtaining his permission) and saw absolutely nothing wrong with copyright issues. More shameless, self-serving hypocrisy from Robert “The Liar” Priddy.

Robert Priddy should immediately delete his defamatory post filled with numerous bold-faced lies and publicly apologize to Darpan. After all, this is exactly the type of behavior that critics demand of me when I make a mistake. They should practice the precept they wish for others to follow.

Reference

Robert Priddy Exposed Again By Joe Moreno

Robert Priddy said (under his oxymoronic name “truthpromoter”):

“To defend my reputation in advance it has become necessary to point out how every posting made by any ex-devotee anywhere on the Internet is followed wherever possible by defamatory comments by GM108 or joe108 (Gerald Moreno) fanatical web-stalker who posts links to side-issues, libel and his trivialities daily. Employed full-time doing dirty tricks to defend Sai Baba and his Organisation. He twists the truth to claim that I am stalking HIM, but I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him (which he has on a grand scale against me!). I am simply warning against his libels.”

Robert Priddy has yet to refute what he calls my “side-issues”, “libel” and “trivialities”. I FULLY reference my articles, unlike Robert Priddy who simply denies, deflects and foams-at-the-mouth (as can be seen by his comments on the screen-cap above). The only person “employed full-time” and using “dirty tricks” to attack Sathya Sai Baba is Robert Priddy (as can be seen on his six Anti-Sai Websites). The reason why I have so many webpages about Robert Priddy is because my thorough documentation of his massive fraudulence is very well established.

Robert Priddy said (about me):

“I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him.”

Needless to say, this is yet another bold-faced untruth from Robert C. Priddy. Take a look at the following webpages where Robert Priddy directly and specifically attacks me. Some of his comments are many paragraphs in length and one webpage anonymously defames me and makes numerous unsupported comments against me:

1. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/head.htm
2. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/
3. home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/SSO%20publicity.htm
4. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm
5. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg0.htm
6. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg1.htm
7. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg3.htm
8. home.chello.no/~reirob/geodata.htm
9. home.no.net/abacusa/T/stooge.htm
10. gethome.no/~reirob/CovUp4.htm
11. gethome.no/~reirob/sorg2.htm

Robert Priddy created an anonymous website attempting to libel me on angeltowns2 and they terminated his account for defamatory content and for violating their terms and conditions (Refs: 01 – 02). Robert Priddy also attacked me anonymously on the QuickTopic forum using the fake name “bandbox” (Reference). Robert Priddy lied about me on a public forum and I responded to his untruths in my article entitled Robert Priddy And His ‘Babafan’ Lie. In addition to these, Robert Priddy made numerous gutter untruths against me on Wikipedia. See:

• A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
• Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa DeWitt
• Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
• Another Unsupported Lie From Robert Priddy
• Say What? More Lies From Anti-Sai’s
• Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again

Therefore, when Robert Priddy said “I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him”, he lied because his numerous comments, libels and defamations against me are not only published on his Anti-Sai Webpages, they are fully recorded on Wikipedia and other public forums.

Robert Priddy also solicits and promotes the defamatory blog of Sanjay Dadlani (who has been fully exposed for his trashy and kinky killuminati blog, streetbitches blog, his Jesus sex fetish and his QuickTopic Deceptions).

Robert Priddy also promotes Alan Kazlev’s defamatory pages against me in which he plays the role of bogus psychiatrist (because he has no credentials in the medical or mental health fields). It is also amusing that Robert Priddy promotes Alan Kazlev when Priddy made fun of the “lunatic fringe” often seen in cults and religious movements (Reference).

As I have said many times before, the more Robert Priddy says, the less I have to defend. Robert Priddy makes the case for me that he is a mentally unstable defamer who lies about others unapologetically (all the while harping on morality, ethics and honesty). Robert Priddy stands exposed, humiliated and ashamed, all from his own doing. He has no one else to blame but himself and no amount of deflection, foaming-at-the-mouth and denial will save him now.

MAJOR UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 13TH 2007
After publishing this page exposing Robert Priddy’s easily verifiable lie about not having created any webpages against me, Robert Priddy went about secretly deleting content against me (offering no explanations, apologies or retractions). The pages deleted or modified were:

1. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/head.htm
2. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/
3. home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/SSO%20publicity.htm
4. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm
5. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg0.htm
6. home.no.net/abacusa/T/stooge.htm

Robert Priddy is now (for the most part) including one paragraph garbling about Alan Kazlev’s webpage against me along with a link going to home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg0.htm#joe. The following screencaps show how information against me was published on the websites above. Another perfect example how Robert Priddy & Co. stealthily attempt to do damage control when their bold-faced lies are thoroughly exposed and documented:

(click on images to enlarge):

Below: Google Results Showing Joe Moreno’s Name:

Below: Screen Shots Of The Deleted Anonymous Webpage Against Joe Moreno:

Below: Before & After Screen Shots Showing Deleted Section:

Reference

Barry Pittard & Robert Priddy Associate Themselves With Proven Perverts

Barry Pittard is the self-professed “international coordinator in attempts to bring Sai Baba to justice” and is the founder of the bogus “global coalition” F.D.S.S.B.. His sidekick is the Anti-Sai Extremist from Oslo Norway, Robert Priddy. Although Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy have thrust themselves into the limelight as being the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement, they purposely suppress the fact that they explicitly, unabashedly and wholly endorse, promote and associate themselves with proven and known perverts, sexual deviants and pathological liars.

The following screen-caps show how both Pittard & Priddy solicit Sanjay Dadlani’s “Sai Baba EXPOSED” blog on their wordpress.com accounts (click on thumbnails to enlarge):

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy see absolutely nothing wrong with Sanjay Dadlani’s homosexual-fantasizing slurs, Jesus Sex Fetish and Boot Sex Fetish. Although Sanjay went around secretly stalking innocent women (calling them “bitches” and “sluts”, saying “they want it”, calling Mothers “MILFs”, photographing females and teenagers up their dresses and under tables and publishing these photos on his streetbitches blog), Barry and Robert are right there holding hands with Sanjay. Shame on Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy!

Sanjay even posted on the QuickTopic Forum (using multiple fake names, including female names) and made disgusting comments under the name “Marquis de Sade”, even duplicating a post about a Priest ejaculating on the face of a little girl, as related by her brother. Sanjay even posted under the name “kick his head in” and said that someone should murder Sathya Sai Baba (of course, this is the same guy who rejoiced when a Sai Baba temple was bombed). Nice friend you have there, Barry & Robert.

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy are fully aware of Reinier van der Sandt’s very disturbing admission to viewing child pornography. Barry and Robert purposely ignore the fact that Reinier used numerous fake names on the SSB2 Yahoo Group and hold hands with him as well (as can be seen with their association with him through the exbaba website).

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy defend, promote and endorse perverts, defamers and liars. What does this say about Barry & Robert? I think the answer is self-evident. As they say, “Birds of feather flock together”.

Hearsay Allegations Against Sathya Sai Baba Questioned Since 2001

Even as far back as 2001, people sympathetic with Anti-Sai Activists were questioning the numerous hearsay claims of sexual abuse against Sathya Sai Baba. On the Sunrise Chat Page, the following conversations were recorded:

59: 11-01-01 TERRIE
“I agree with you about the non-value of hearsay. That is one reason that I have ‘retired’ from the exposé, except for helping a little with Sunrise. The Sunrise staff will not emphasize the molestation stories because we don’t know anyone personally who was molested. We also will no longer post letters by someone who says, “I know somone who was molested,” or “I’m in contact with victims.” If the so-called victims want to fight for what is right, then it is up to them to speak out and use their real names, not send their message via a third party. It is the victims who should be carrying the exposé, not those who are relying on hearsay.”

66: 11-05-01 TERRIE
“Barry, I am not the ex-devotee in the street. I’ve helped with Sunrise almost from its beginning and have monitored discussion boards. If you and everyone else who personally knows victims have not seen fit to put even one victim in touch with me (aside from the few well known victims who have posted their stories on the Internet), where does that put faith and trust? Do you think I am going to shout the names of sb’s victims from the rooftops??? I am therefore put in my present position of not being a credible witness to anything. Time to leave the floundering exposé.”

72: 11-08-01 BARRY PITTARD
“I shall briefly mention an issue which, I suppose, will have to keep coming up until it is resolved. Quite a few pro ssb apologists AND former devotees have asked: Where are the victims? One of the difficulties encountered again and again is this: some victims say they will testify, then back off. Some would like to but are afraid re e.g., parents, friends, work situations, handling the emotional stuff that comes up … etc. Not everyone agrees with all the secrecy. I see a real point in it. When I get time, I shall perhaps make out the case. I used to think it was obvious; however, I find that not all former devotee activists agree. I’d be happy for them to make out a sustained, well-argued case for openness. Personally, I have found that – at least for the time being – the fewer persons who have access to victims’ information the more secure they feel, and the better becomes the rapport. As I view it, if we could all be sure that there is not, sometimes, mischief abroad, and, at other times, even simple human inadvertences, then the case for secrecy may be quite dismal. Love, Barry”

73: 11-08-01 SUNRISE
“We continue to feel that the victims should be out there fighting for themselves and any future victims there might be. The current situation reminds us of the prince (victims) who sends his servant (non-victims working for the exposé) to fetch the bride (the truth about sb). The bride never makes it back to the prince, but runs off with the servant. (Without the victims, the truth will be known only to a few “believers,” and the exposé will fail.) The exposé cannot succeed without the victims having the courage to present themselves before the world and tell their story.” (Reference)

Fast forward to the current time and the situation has not changed one bit. The Anti-Sai Movement is mostly carried on the shoulders of Ex-Devotees who were never “molested” or “sexually abused” themselves.

Although a few alleged victims were very vocal on the internet, they have refused to file even a basic police complaint against Sathya Sai Baba in India. For example, Said Afshin Khorramshahgol claimed he was sexually abused (although at the time of his alleged abuse he was not aware that Baba’s actions were “sexual”) and made literally thousands of posts (and created his own website) shouting about his alleged sexual abuse. Therefore, Afshin was not embarrassed or afraid about parents, friends or fellow employees finding out. Nor was he afraid of “handling the emotional stuff that comes up”. So why haven’t Anti-Sai Activists assisted Afshin in filing a police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India? The answer is because Afshin Khorramshahgol is not credible. Afshin claimed that Baba touched his penis, made Afshin touch his penis and that Baba was moaning “sexually” while making “loud, wild voices”, yet did not realize all this was sexual until after he saw a video allegedly showing Baba faking a materialization many months after his alleged interviews. Said Afshin Khorramshahgol’s online behavior also shows he appears to have very disturbing mental issues. Despite critics claiming that Sathya Sai Baba’s “empire” is worth “billions of dollars”, not even money-hungry lawyers will touch alleged victims. Ever wonder why?

Therefore, the Anti-Sai Movement relies almost exclusively on people who were never “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba. The Anti-Sai Movement is based solely on the contradictory stories of six non-anonymous and alleged “victims” and numerous hearsay allegations, rumors, gossip, speculations, assumptions, conspiracy theories, second/third-hand accounts and anonymous accusations. This sums up the Anti-Sai Movement in a nutshell.

To Date:

• Sathya Sai Baba has never been proven to be a “charlatan”.
• Sathya Sai Baba has never been convicted of any crime.
• Sathya Sai Baba has never been charged with any crime.
• Sathya Sai Baba has never had even one single complaint lodged against him by any alleged victim, first-hand, in India. As a matter of fact, not even one alleged victim has even tried to file a basic police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India (the only place where courts would have jurisdiction over Baba as an individual defendent).

These are the cold, hard facts and no rationalist, critic, skeptic or ex-devotee can provide a scintilla of verifiable evidence to the contrary.

Anti-Sai Activist’s greatest accomplishments lie in conning the general public with deception, rhetoric and propaganda. Ex-Devotees have become extremely proficient in recyling their Anti-Sai slop and peddling it off as the “truth” to the unsuspecting masses. Needless to say, even those sympathetic with ex-devotees were disturbed by the numerous hearsay accounts leveled against Sai Baba. In 2001, Barry Pittard said “the case for secrecy may be quite dismal”. Six years later and Barry Pittard is still resorting to the “secrecy” and “confidential” excuses. The Anti-Sai Movement has all but collapsed on itself and the exposé has “failed” and is “floundering” (furthered by Unesco’s Letter of Regret and the US State Department Removing All Indirect References To Sathya Sai Baba From Their Website). There is simply no verifiable proof that can be cited to support the claim that the Anti-Sai Movement has any steam left to fuel it. There is plenty of proof, however, that the Anti-Sai Movement has plenty of hot gas left to fuel it.

Reference

Robert Priddy Lies Again About Joe Moreno

On digg.com Robert Priddy said (under his oxymoronic name “truthpromoter”):

“To defend my reputation in advance it has become necessary to point out how every posting made by any ex-devotee anywhere on the Internet is followed wherever possible by defamatory comments by GM108 or joe108 (Gerald Moreno) fanatical web-stalker who posts links to side-issues, libel and his trivialities daily. Employed full-time doing dirty tricks to defend Sai Baba and his Organisation. He twists the truth to claim that I am stalking HIM, but I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him (which he has on a grand scale against me!). I am simply warning against his libels.”

Click On Thumbnail To Enlarge:

Robert Priddy has yet to refute what he calls my “side-issues”, “libel” and “trivialities”. I FULLY reference my articles, unlike Robert Priddy who simply denies, deflects and foams-at-the-mouth (as can be seen by his comments on the screen-cap above). The only person “employed full-time” and using “dirty tricks” to attack Sathya Sai Baba is Robert Priddy (as can be seen on his six Anti-Sai Websites). The reason why I have so many webpages about Robert Priddy is because my thorough documentation of his massive fraudulence is very well established.

Robert Priddy said (about me):

“I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him.”

Needless to say, this is yet another bold-faced untruth from Robert C. Priddy. Take a look at the following webpages where Robert Priddy directly and specifically attacks me. Some of his comments are many paragraphs in length and one webpage anonymously defames me and makes numerous unsupported comments against me:

1. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/head.htm
2. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/
3. home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/SSO%20publicity.htm
4. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm
5. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg0.htm
6. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg1.htm
7. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg3.htm
8. home.chello.no/~reirob/geodata.htm
9. home.no.net/abacusa/T/stooge.htm
10. gethome.no/~reirob/CovUp4.htm
11. gethome.no/~reirob/sorg2.htm

Robert Priddy created an anonymous website attempting to libel me on angeltowns2 and they terminated his account for defamatory content and for violating their terms and conditions (Refs: 01 – 02). Robert Priddy also attacked me anonymously on the QuickTopic forum using the fake name “bandbox” (Reference). Robert Priddy lied about me on a public forum and I responded to his untruths in my article entitled Robert Priddy And His ‘Babafan’ Lie. In addition to these, Robert Priddy made numerous gutter untruths against me on Wikipedia. See:

• A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
• Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa DeWitt
• Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
• Another Unsupported Lie From Robert Priddy
• Say What? More Lies From Anti-Sai’s
• Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again

Therefore, when Robert Priddy said “I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him”, he lied because his numerous comments, libels and defamations against me are not only published on his Anti-Sai Webpages, they are fully recorded on Wikipedia and other public forums.

Robert Priddy also solicits and promotes the defamatory blog of Sanjay Dadlani (who has been fully exposed for his trashy and kinky killuminati blog, streetbitches blog, his Jesus sex fetish and his QuickTopic Deceptions).

Robert Priddy also promotes Alan Kazlev‘s defamatory pages against me in which he plays the role of bogus psychiatrist (because he has no credentials in the medical or mental health fields). It is also amusing that Robert Priddy promotes Alan Kazlev when Priddy made fun of the “lunatic fringe” often seen in cults and religious movements (Reference).

As I have said many times before, the more Robert Priddy says, the less I have to defend. Robert Priddy makes the case for me that he is a mentally unstable defamer who lies about others unapologetically (all the while harping on morality, ethics and honesty). Robert Priddy stands exposed, humiliated and ashamed, all from his own doing. He has no one else to blame but himself and no amount of deflection, foaming-at-the-mouth and denial will save him now.

Reference

Fraudulent Pedophilia/Pedophile Ring & Child Sexual Abuse Claims

Anti-Sai Activists wage an unremitting smear campaign against Sathya Sai Baba that accuses him of “serial pedophilia” and the sexual abuse of “boys” and “children”. These comments are fallacious, unsustantiated and wholly untrue. “Pedophilia” is the sexual abuse or exploitation of a boy, girl or child 12/13 years of age or younger (Ref). TO DATE: There are no testimonies or complaints from boys, children or parents of children that support the erroneous claim that Sathya Sai Baba is a pedophile/paedophile who engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior with any child 12/13 years of age or younger.

As a matter of fact, the youngest, non-anonymous testimony came from Jed Geyerhahn, a 16 year-old teenager who claimed he received a non-sexual “oiling” (and kept going back over and over again to see the Indian Guru until he became disenfranchised). All other alleged victims were 18 years of age or older (Reference). This goes to show how those inimical towards Satya Sai Baba resort to cheap propaganda, bold-faced untruths and blatant disinformation because the truth simply does not argue in their favor.

Barry Pittard submitted a vicious and defamatory article on the “free-press-release.com” website and falsely stated: “U.S. State Department Names Sathya Sai Baba Re Pedophile Accusations” (Reference). Needless to say, this comment is wholly untrue and a gutter fabrication. Read the real story behind the US State Department Advisory and how they removed all indirect references about Sathya Sai Baba from their official website.

On Salon.com there is a comments section entitled “Sai Baba: Pedophile or God incarnate?” in which people posted several comments about Sathya Sai Baba being a “homosexual pedophile”. Neeless to say, Michelle Goldberg purposely suppressed her hidden bias in her Salon.com article entitled “Untouchable?” See For Yourself.

TO DATE: There have been no public testimonies, affidavits, grievances, police complaints, court cases or the like filed against Sathya Sai Baba for alleged acts of sexual impropriety with “kids”, “children” or “boys”. Despite all the allegations of “pedophilia”, not even one critic, skeptic, rationalist, journalist or media has been able to confirm or verify even one single instance of “paedophilia” against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba.

Ex-Devotees love to boast about all the negative media against Sathya Sai Baba (which they claimed they accomplished through unremitting “e-bombing” campaigns). Despite all these “notable” media organizations and journalists investigating and reporting the alleged “pedophile” issue for 10+ years, no one can confirm or verify even one case of “pedophilia” against Sai Baba. This proves that the paedophile allegations against Sathya Sai Baba are based on lies, deceit, dishonesty, rumors, gossip, conspiracy theories and hearsay accounts.

Anti-Sai Activists are shameless liars and deceivers who are tying to expose Satya Sai Baba by resorting to calumny, ridicule, libel and deceit. Those opposing Satya Sai Baba lack the most basic integrity and their bittereness and vindictiveness are clearly evident in their error-filled and ever-so-inaccurate writings.

Reference

Ex-Devotee Of Sathya Sai Baba REJOICED When Sai Baba Temple Bombed

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

This entry is an update to my former articles: Sanjay Defending Sathya Sai Baba & Lord Krishna’s Inability To Protect His Devotees?

On the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group Sanjay said:

And damn right, I am so happy that SB temples are being bombed. This is SB’s own karma coming back to him. What a great God he is, he couldn’t even protect his own temple, what a magnificent avatar. I wonder if anyone actually died in the blast (Reference).

Regarding the bombing at the ISKCON temple, let me repeat my former argument (using Sanjay’s words) with a slight modification: What a great God Lord Krishna is: He couldn’t even protect his own temple and devotees on his birthday celebrations. What a magnificent avatar!

Sanjay himself argued that an avatar’s inability to protect his temple reveals the said avatar’s real power. Needless to say, Sanjay just made the perfect argument against his own chosen savior (Sri Krishna) that he made against Sathya Sai Baba.

Sanjay is making this way too easy for me.

Enough said!

Regarding The Bombing Near A Sai Baba Temple:
First and foremost, the bombing did not occur at a Sathya Sai Baba temple. It occurred near a famous Shirdi Sai Baba Temple in Dilsukhnagar (Reference).

Anti-Sai Activists have erroneously contended (as they often do) that the bombing occurred near a Sathya Sai Baba temple in Andhra Pradesh and made the following comments:

http://www.saiguru.net/english/news/021122birthday.htm
At the same time, Naxalites and Maoists continue a bombing campaign in Andhra Pradesh about which the world hears nothing. The Express Network reports on 22-11-02 : “One killed, 16 hurt in bomb temple blast” and “a bomb went off near the popular Sai Baba temple in the crowded Dilsukhnagar area” (see link 2 below). Could it be that not everyone loves SB, as he claims. Not even in his own State?

Fortunately, Gulam Yazdani, the man who committed this bombing (among other vicious attacks), was gunned down and stopped by the police (Reference).

Needless to say, Sanjay jumped onto the Anti-Sai bandwagon-of-deceit and rejoiced in the bombing, expressing his happiness, excitement and delight that a Sai temple was bombed and wondered if anyone was killed!

Sanjay is a sicko desperately in need of orthodox psychological help.

Shocking Defamations From Ex-Devotee Of Sathya Sai Baba

Following several scathing exposures about Anthony Tony O’Clery‘s very disturbing online behavior and shocking defamations, he continues to viciously, erroneously and defiantly defame others without proof. This is the guy who is trying to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba and who attempts to deceive others into thinking that he is dedicated to the truth and morality.

After publishing my article about Tony O’Clery’s Vandalism On Wikipedia, he made the following comments on the SSB Yahoo Group and the QuickTopic forum:

Are these extreme pro sbs pedophiles?
Namaste,
It seems to me that the pro sai activistd defend too much. Is it
because they themselves belong to gay pedophile rings? (Reference)

Is the real reason pro sb activists are so vituperative because they are gay pedophiles like sb.? (Reference)

There is a strange connection between simon defending pedophilia and the actions of simom joe and lisa, they all seem to be gay but are they more? (Reference)

With regard to the 3 amigos of the gay-pedophile-groupie club.
One of the greatest problems that pedophiles like sb and his ring have is self-delusion. Like the ancient greek hoplites they think that pedophilia is just like being gay and that one day it will be recognised as a normal human interaction instead of Ahimsa. This is why the supports of sb in the gay-pedophile-groupie club, namely joe, simon and lisa are so vehement for they are on a crusade and are locked in physically, psychologically and sexually to the concept. (Reference)

joe lisa and simon answer a question.
Namaste,
As founder members of the gay-pedophile-goupie club, I need a question answered, from joe lisa and simon. Do members of the club do anal intercourse and fellation like sai baba? Do female members do cunnilingus and use dildos?This is a puzzling question, perhaps you sai devotees can answer it for from your own and sb’s experience… (Reference)

sb and prashant nilayam have enlisted a gay pedophile groupie club
Namaste,
It is obvious that perhaps not only jose geraldo moreno is being financially retained but lisa and simon as well. If they are not then joe and sb are conning them. However it is interesting how the world of gay pedophiles is coming to the defence of sb. (Reference)

Hi got into the hotel internet cafe
Hi,
I have a question did nirmal at the brothel in prashanti nilayam get a hold of joe or simon yet about their unpaid bills, and the death of devadatta?…S. (Reference)

Brothel owner trying to contact simon and joe.
Just got this from offshore.
Devadatta’s mother wants to contact simon and joe. Namaste, I hear Nirmal, the prashanti nilayam brothel Madam, is quoted as saying that poor little Devadatta’s mother is looking for Simon and Joe. He had said they were the nicest clients to him notwithstanding the disgusting things they made him do. His mother wants to know why he died, who stole his organs and why Joe didn’t pay his brothel bill, causing the sequence of events. She said that she wants to thank simon for giving Devadatta dope to kill the pain of his existence………. (Reference)

That’s right, Tony O’Clery is questioning if Pro-Sai Activists, Lisa, Simon and I belong to “gay pedophile rings”, are “gay”, are “gay pedophiles”, are “3 amigos of the gay-pedophile-groupie club” and that we are being “financially retained”! O’Clery also defamed India’s President as being “in all liklehood a gay pedophile like his guru”.

Tony O’Clery makes the case for me that Anti-Sai Activists are a bunch of liars, defamers and vindictive people who bitterly resort to lies, deceit and dishonesty because the truth simply does not argue in their favor. Where are all the moral and truthful Anti-Sai Activists taking a stand against Tony O’Clery’s defamations against others? They silently endorse and approve his comments (which is evidenced by their silence and continued support of Tony O’Clery).

The truth about Anti-Sai Activists is now out and there is no stopping it.

Reference

Tony O’Clery’s Multiple Personality Disorder

Tony O’Clery (an ex-devotee of Sathya Sai Baba) normally posts under the yahoo name “aoclery”. Nevertheless, O’Clery has not been able to suppress his multiple-personality disorder and deceptively attempted to post under the name “sivatayi_2000″ and lied about it until he was caught in the act by me. Click Here to see how I caught O’Clery lying about using the name “sivatayi_2000″. Even when confronted with proof about using the name “sivatayi_2000″, O’Clery continued to lie and denied he made posts under that name. Compare the IP for sivatayi_2000 with the IP for aoclery. They are identical. Click Here too see a post where O’Clery messed up and accidentally posted his message under the fake name “sivatayi_2000″ using his own name!

Just recently, O’Clery is once again attempting to deceive the gullible and naive into thinking that someone else in his household is posting under the name “saktidasa”, allegedly named “Narayan”. However, it is clear that Tony O’clery is lying about not being “saktidasa” (apparently, splitting off to another one of his multiple personalities).

To prove my point, O’Clery signed his own name (i.e., “Tony”) to multiple submissions posted under the name “saktidasa” on his advaitajnana Yahoo Group (Refs: 01 – 02). Why would O’Clery sign his own name to messages allegedly written by “Narayan” (i.e., “Saktidasa”) if he is not “Saktidasa”? I am sure that O’Clery will resort to more of his psycho-babble to explain these significant errors. But to those of us who are aware of O’Clery’s ceaseless pathological lying, his behavior is just more of the same old deceptive slop. It is also important to point out that Saktidasa also begins his posts with “Namaste” and resorts to O’Clery’s typical usage of multiple periods: “……”

View the following two recent posts:
O’Clery: Source Code: IP: 24.207.11.151.
Saktidasa: Source Code: IP: 24.207.11.151
The IPs are exactly the same. This means that O’Clery and Saktidasa are using the SAME ip resolving to the SAME internet service provider (Delta Cable Communications Ltd.) originating in the SAME city (Vancouver) in the SAME state (British Columbia) in the SAME country (Canada).

Now let us look at the sexually-focused vulgarities, defamatory comments and ruthless insults that O’Clery likes to post under the guise of fake names:

Hey Joe, Do you remember when you and simon and I went up to ooty for the sb orgy? It was so great with the sai trust queers as well. We were all in a great daisy-chain and the homosexual fellatio sex with sb was great. Simon helped a lot by showing us all how to make hash oil and the best way to smoke a bong. I must say the show you put on with simon and sb was fantastic; I’ve never seen such a sex show looked like a Hindu God with six arms and legs, definately the beast with three backs………..Its great being a gay isn’t it? I draw the line about going down to the dormitory with you and simon to molest the students though…..N. May be I should put this on a blog, as there will be a continuation of posts (Reference).

Dil-Do Dinah on Lisa. Hi there, Since I exposed simon and joe for what they really are, I have rec’d some email from a lesbian girl that has fallen out with Lisa. She said she will be sending me some revelations about her failed relationship with lisa and others in lisa’s coven………….N (Reference)

Hi guys, I will be returning to the Caribbean soon, however I will keep in touch from time to time. I have to use the internet cafes….N. p.s. I’m not Tony I’m Narayan and Tony doesn’t live in the Caribbean (Reference).

dil-do dinah says lisa into sado-masochism. Hi there, dil-do dinah has written to me giving the reasons she ended her relationship with lisa. It was due to sado masochism during the sex act. I wouldn’t repeat all she emailed me as it is too far out and disgusting. Let be said that it was over lisa’s insistance on using a massive dil-do that cause excruciating pain during sex, and the chanting of sai baba, sai baba, the lord is sai baba, during it made it all worse………N (Reference).

Devadatta’s mother wants to contact simon and joe. Namaste, I hear Nirmal, the brothel Madam, is quoted as saying that poor little Devadatta’s mother is looking for Simon and Joe. He had said they were the nicest clients to him notwithstanding the disgusting things they made him do. His mother wants to know why he died, who stole his organs and why Joe didn’t pay his brothel bill, causing the sequence of events. She said that she wants to thank simon for giving Devadatta dope to kill the pain of his existence……….Narayan. p.s. I am not Tony as you will find out when you soon check my IP from the caribbean. (Reference).

HIV scare at PN-Simon and Joe get checked. Hi there, A scare about HIV at pn was issued recently. They believe the infection may have started in the pedophile brothel as the other hetero brothels are clear. So simon and joe go and get checked immediately in case you are spreading hiv amongst children…N (Reference).

are simon and joe spreading hiv to little boys? Hi there, simon and joe go and get checked, you may have picked up hiv at nirmal’s boy brothel………N (Reference).

dil-do dinah says lisa molested her daughter. Hi there, I wasn’t going to post this but now it is necessary. Dinah told me the final reason for breaking up with lisa was because lisa molested her nine year old daughter….N (Reference).

gita caught animal HIV is pn bestiality brothel. Hey there, Just in from pn. Gita sick with aids, has to crap in a golden bucket for perverted sex practises of sb’s politician and judge friends. Most of the animals used for bestiality are blessed by sb first so they give good sex to his friends…….sbs den of vice is constantly reaching new lows of depravity, first a pedophile brothel, now if that isn’t bad enough but bestiality as well?………Narayan. (Reference).

Narayan here not Tony, same IP, and ID wireless, in guest house. Hey there, Sort things out yet? I will be back in Cuba soon,so you won’t be able to correspond with me so much.hehehehe. Did you get your HIV test, I was serious about that pedophile brothel infection in pn..N (Reference).

Update: July 26th 2006
Conclusively Proving O’Clery Is “Saktidasa”
After doing more research, I discovered the following information that conclusively proves that O’Clery is “Saktidasa” (once again confirming that Tony Bologna O’Clery is a pathological liar with deeply rooted psychological problems):

On Audaraya-Fellowship.com, Tony posted under the name “Saktidasa” and signed the posts with his own name (i.e., “Tony”): References 01 – 02 – 03 – 04. On the following posts, not only did Tony make these submissions under the name “Saktidasa”, he also signed his name as “Saktidas/Tony”: References 01 – 02. On the NondualitySalon Yahoo Group, “Saktidasa” posted there on August 13th 2005 (Reference) and his IP resolves to Tony’s IP in Vancouver, British Columbia (meaning “Saktidasa” is not from the Caribbean). Other posts on the NondaualitySalon Yahoo Group, Tony posted as “Saktidasa”, even signing the posts as “Saktidass/Tony”: References: 01 – 02 – 03. As mentioned before, O’Clery signed his own name (i.e., “Tony”) to multiple submissions posted under the name “saktidasa” on his own advaitajnana Yahoo Group (Refs: 01 – 02). As a matter of fact, Tony even admitted he was “Saktidasa” on the HarshaSatsangh Yahoo Group (Reference).

Now why would O’Clery sign his own name to multiple messages submitted by “Saktidasa” on Yahoo Groups on other public forums if he is not Saktidasa? Tony is a liar.

Update: July 27th 2006
Conclusively Proving O’Clery Is “Dingopl”
View the following two recent posts:
O’Clery: Source Code: IP: 24.207.11.151
Dingopl: Source Code: IP: 24.207.11.151
The IPs are exactly the same.

Tony Bologna O’Clery even signed his own name (i.e., “Tony”) to posts submitted by Dingopl: References: 01 – 02 – 03.

One will also notice how many of these posts contain the exact same writing style with the exact same content that O’Clery is well known for prattling about. All of the posts either begin with “Namaste” “Hey there” or “Hi there”, Prashanti Nilayam is referred to as “pn”, references to “brothels”, references to Sathya Sai Baba as “sb” and the signatures are usually preceded with a series of periods (examples: “…..Tony” or “……dingopl” or “……N” or “…..T”). Furthermore, all of these posts share the very same IP that O’Clery uses. O’Clery recently tried to explain away these facts by saying that multiple users are sharing his computer. Not only that, but he and these multiple users are also sharing their personal Yahoo Accounts! Since O’Clery contends that the “Saktidasa” and “Dingopl are not his names (which is a lie), this means that O’Clery is purposely using other’s accounts to make posts on Yahoo Groups. Why O’Clery would feel a need to make posts under someone else’s name is unknown, but clearly points to deception. Personally, I do not believe O’Clery as he is unbelievable. It is clear to me that all the names used by him trace back to him and his writing style. Apparently, Tony is running scared and making excuses to cover his tracks. Too late Tony!

In Conclusion…
As I have said before, Anthony Tony O’Clery is an Anti-Sai Clown who has been playing his Bozo role for so long, he has forgotten to remove his red-nose and costume. O’Clery thinks that since gullible Anti-Sai Activists have bought into his comedy routine that the general public will do likewise. Luckily, that is not the case. This is the guy who is trying to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba. Such being the case, it is of little wonder that the Anti-Sai Movement lost all of its perceived crediblity a very long time ago.

Reference

Aoclery’s Bologna Machine Kicks Into High Gear

On the SSB2 Yahoo Group and on a QuickTopic message-board, Tony “Bologna” O’Clery is spreading vicious lies in which he now asserts that when he was a devotee he was aware of prostitution, drug, sex and pedophile rings at Sai Baba‘s ashrams. O’Clery even claims he knows where these alleged pedophile rings are located at! Despite allegedly knowing all this information, O’Clery did absolutely nothing about it and allowed and ignored (if true) the sexual abuse of children!

As a matter of fact, O’Clery strongly denied the allegations of pedophilia and sexual abuse against Sathya Sai Baba when he was a devotee. Now however, O’Clery is taking it one step further and is now claiming that he “narrowly escaped” being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba himself!

The following posts were made on a kundalini website by Anthony O’Clery when he was a devotee of Sri Sathya Sai Baba. Very revealing, if you ask me.

On a Kundalini website, Tony O’Clery (aka “aoclery”) said:

Namaste All,On the K-list, as most of you probably noticed, there was an attack on Sai Baba. He neither needs any praise or defence. The usual claims that he molests little boys etc. How the President and Prime Minister of India haven’t noticed this I don’t know!
Anyway I personally know the ‘high profile’ individuals, who are travelling around doing this, Sweden, New York, Europe, Australia etc. There are complicated reasons why they are doing this and I can’t mention them here.

After the battle of Lanka and the defeat of Ravana, one of Rama’s generals came up and stated how happy he had been to serve. Rama replied ‘yes, but in your next life you will be my enemy.’

This is the concept of miracle-game or ‘Leela’. One has to bear in mind ‘all is one’, even in this appearance upon The Self. It is the The Lord who plays both the friend and foe, demon and saint, for whatever reason, inexplicable to our minds. Sometimes more can be done by a foe rather than a friend. Hatred, at least, is not indifference.

In the end result it is what one learns from the Guru, that is important. As Swami says.” Don’t be a devotee of My Form, but of My Teachings”.

Love and Sai Ram, Tony. (Reference)

On a Kundalini website, Tony O’Clery (aka “aoclery”) said:

Sai Ram Brothers and Sisters,Here is a copy of a posting on that negative Site of Bailey and company.(I see others posted as well,John D. but I fear it may be a waste for those who are debunkers, but it will help those who come across the site)

Greetings!

I also have seen vibhuti and amrit manifest as I watched. In Srirangapatna, I had lockets in the palm of my hand produce unending copious amounts of amrit.One tiny locket filled a glass below my hand. I have seen the same thing elsewhere as well, where there is no room for trickery. Whether some of the manifestations are real or apports is really irrelevant. The biggest miracles are in the transformation of His devotees, I am an example, He took me off alcohol and introduced me to meditation and Vedanta, I am a huge sceptic. Unfortunately to a legal or critical eye, none of the accusations stand up, they are all hearsay. What about the ‘wishfulfilling tree’, at Prashanti that produced all kinds of different fruit. Also to a man who has produced a living breathing monkey in front of witnesses in the interview room. Anything is possible. If He was the pervert that some accuse Him of being, he wouldn’t need boys from the college, he could make His own, with no repercussions!!!!!!

I am still a Devotee but I have gone beyond needing a Guru. If this is the case with some then go peacefully to your own contemplation, these attacks on Baba indicate your remaining intense attachment to Him. This is whom you will merge at death!! If there is any weakness in His organisation it is that devotees especially some executives do not follow his,’commandments’, but that is the egoistic human condition. This is a far more serious thing than debunking miracles, for these people are His representatives in the world so to speak. So WATCH! Most of what I see here on this site is unscientific, unacademic and hearsay from people who’se egoistic desires were not met by Swami in some way.

Love and Sai Ram,Tony. (Reference)

On a Kundalini website, Tony O’Clery (aka “aoclery”) said:

Namaste All, a couple of points; Jenell, Dan etcMy observations about the state of K of many on this list, is not judgemental just an observation. It is obvious that most is just cleansing prana and lower chakra activity. To me anyway!

Secondly: Dan Winter’s rush to judgement on Sai Baba, very unprepared and displayed incredible ignorance of Tantra, Ojas etc for someone on a K list. Seems to fit my observations mentioned above.

He wrote:-It seems Dan Winter was after all correct about Sai Baba…I have recently made contact with some former VIP devotees from the UK, Sweden and Australia. They all claim the same independently and there is now proof coming out that Sai Baba is nothing more than a simple fraud with no mystical powers and he is having sexual relationships with some of his young students

With grace it has taken my some time and several hundred combined posts, ( I was posting by myself against the group of donkeys) to totally demolish the credibility of the posters and that site. Their final ‘ace in the hole’, turned into a dud and there was really no evidence of sexual impropriety by Baba. Tantric Healing and Ojas stimulation that’s all, most of these debunkers were totally ignorant of K, Tantra, Ojas, Chakras, Nadis etc, as it seems the case with some here on K-list as well.

The only thing they established was that Swami didn’t manifest all the time, a well known fact to those that read what he has said about this.

It was admitted there were miracles, bilocations and strange phenomena around and connected with him.

Their main stars Bailey and even Larsson proved nothing in the sexual allegations except an ignorance of Tantra. Sure they were shocked to find out that he didn’t materialise all the time but I had quotes for that. Their level of devotion was based on miracles that’s all. The other thing that was obvious was that Baba was using Ateeta Sakti or Yogic Mass Hypnotism as Moses did with the staff into a snake trick with the Egytian priests.

I feel sorry that their site has been demolished, and discredited so but it was based on crude slander, unfounded allegations, and a singular unprofessional and unprepared approach. All allegation were answered by; Yes he doesn’t materialise all the time and he conjures and Yes there was sexual touching to do with chakras energy and ojas, all else was fabrication by disgruntled people in one case a student who failed in the school.
I don’t want to argue the toss with people on here like I did with those losing donkeys and filtheaters on the other site, but this is my answer to Dan Winter’s horseshit and sensationalism that is so damaging to people more sensitive than he is. If you don’t want to leave it as this then by all means bring out the guns and do your worst but let it lie at your feet. In the meantime read up on prophets, tantra etc. I do not want to descend to the gutter and rhetoric that I had to use to discredit that site and their evidence, that’s up to you.

Tony O’Clery,

ready if you are! Dan, I can hardly take you seriously anymore or your friends. (Reference)

This from a guy who believes that he can converse with dead people and hear their voices in his head and that he enters demon trances. No kidding! Such are the Anti-Sai weirdos, clowns and nutters trying to “expose” Satya Sai Baba.

Reference