Sai Baba, Ranjitha & Swami Nithyananda YouTube Sex Scandal Videos

Sai Baba, Ranjitha & Swami Nithyananda YouTube Sex Scandal Videos

Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy (both caustic critics and defamers of Sathya Sai Baba and others) wrote amusing articles on their Anti-Sai WordPress blogs feebly attempting to draw caricatured comparisions between Paramahamsa Nithyananda Swamiji of Life Bliss Foundation – Dhyanapeetnam and Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba of Prashanti Nilayam – Puttaparthi.

What actual comparisons can be drawn between Nithyananda and Sathya Sai Baba? What actual parallels can be made? Let us find out:

NITHYANANDA / SAI BABA: COMPARISON ONE:

About Paramahamsa Nithyananda: There are actual videos with actual footage of Swami Nithyananda engaging in consentual & intimate behavior with Tamil actress Ranjitha:
Nithyananda Sex Scandal YouTube Video 01
Nithyananda Sex Scandal YouTube Video 02.

About Sathya Sai Baba: There are no videos with actual footage of Sathya Sai Baba engaging in any sort of consentual & intimate behavior with anyone.

CONCLUSION: There is simply NO comparison between Nithyananda and Sathya Sai Baba whatsoever.

NITHYANANDA / SAI BABA: COMPARISON TWO:

About Paramahamsa Nithyananda: Nityananda admitted he was the person in the YouTube videos and admitted that the Tamil actress Ranjitha engaged in the behaviors recorded therein (Reference).

About Sathya Sai Baba: Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) made any sort of admission to any sort of inappropriate behavior and there are no videos of the guru engaging in any sort of questionable behavior.

CONCLUSION: There is simply NO comparison between Nithyananda and Sathya Sai Baba whatsoever.

NITHYANANDA / SAI BABA: COMPARISON THREE:

About Paramahamsa Nithyananda: Official court cases were filed against Nityananda in India and Nityananda himself submitted a writ petition defending himself (01020304).

About Sathya Sai Baba: No alleged victim has ever filed (first-hand) a single court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India for any alleged acts of impropriety. Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) had to obtain legal representation and has never (ever) submitted a writ petition defending himself. Furthermore, no basic police complaints have ever been filed first-hand against Sathya Sai Baba in India by any alleged victim (Reference).

CONCLUSION: There is simply NO comparison between Nithyananda and Sathya Sai Baba whatsoever.

Pittard & Priddy’s Absurd Nithyananda Comparisions:

The fact of the matter is that Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy are bitter and vindictive extremists who argue their case via conspiracy, speculation and homo-erotic self-projection. It is apparent that Pittard & Priddy are attempting to gain cheap publicity (the only kind they can obtain) for their blogs by writing about the highly-charged controversy surrounding Swami Nithyananda and Tamil actress Ranjitha.

Gerald Joe Moreno has written a strongly defended article entitled Refuting The Allegations Against Sathya Sai Baba With Factual Information that exposes the many gutter and smear campaigns waged by Barry Pittard, Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees on the internet.

Despite Pittard & Priddy’s desperate and frenzied attempts to smear Sathya Sai Baba and draw dubious comparisions with Swamiji Nithyananda and Swamiji Bhimanand, Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) had a single police complaint filed against him by any alleged victim and not even one mother or father has come forward with a public grievance or court case in India alleging impropriety against the Guru.

How’s that for a real eye-opener?

5 Responses

  1. You are a sai devotee which is a great thing. But you do not need to defame Paramahamsa Nithyananda especially when you clearly do not know his side. I have lived with him in his ashram and seen him every day for 3 months. From this experience I can vouch for his authenticity and character. The comparison you made to defend Sai Baba is actually casting Paramahamsa in a bad light which is far from the truth. Please do not insult any enlightened master (I am sure even Sai baba agrees with this).

    Sai Ram

  2. Vishwas,

    I am aware of the sensitivities involved and I apologize if any feeling were hurt. This issue is a delicate one but one that needs to be addressed. Barry Pittard & Robert Priddy (anti-Sai fanatics and defamers of the worst order) are dishonestly attempting to publicly associate Sathya Sai Baba with the Paramahamsa Nithyananda “sex” scandal (I seriously doubt that reasonable people would equate consentual kissing and cuddling between adults as “sex”, although the issue of Nithyananda’s sanyas seems to be the focus for the outrage).

    I felt an open and honest response was required, hence this article. None of the information in this article is untrue, misrepresented or embellished. I know that the YouTube vidoes are bitter pills for Nithyananda devotees to swallow. However, in issues such as these, it is important (in my opinion) that all available information be put on the table. One simply can’t run away from this information or deny it exists. The videos, newspaper articles and Nithyananda’s comments about the controversy are all public domain.

    Someone posted the following article on my other blog about this issue. Hope it helps to balance out the views expressed in my article:

    What the Paramahamsa Nithyananda Scandal Can Teach Us All

  3. Felt this fit the situation and responses….

    Who is it that loves?

    “Who is it that loves and who that suffers?
    He alone stages a play with Himself.
    The individual suffers because he perceives duality.
    Find the One everywhere and in everything
    and there will be an end to pain and suffering.”

    – Sri Anandamayi

    Om and Prem

  4. Sairam. I like your way of presentation in all matters. May our Sai bless you.

  5. Lets first understand our indian media who tries to attack all the major guru’s in india…

    Let’s first avoid watching the sensational news coming out from such media to protect our belief towards our master and our dharma.

    WHO CONTROLS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IN INDIA?

    NDTV:
    Funded by Gospels of Charity in Spain. Supports Communism. Recently it has developed a soft corner towards Pakistan because the Pakistan President has allowed only this channel to be aired in Pakistan. Indian CEO Prannoy Roy is co-brother of Prakash Karat, Gen Secy of Communist party of India.

    CNN-IBN:
    Funded solely by the Southern Baptist Church in the US. It has branches in all over the world with headquarters in the US. The Church annually allocates 800 million dollars for promotion of this channel. Its Indian head is Rajdeep Sardesai and his wife Sagarika Ghosh.

    TIMES GROUP LIST:
    TIMES OF INDIA, MID-DAY, NAV-BHARTH TIMES, STARDUST, FEMINA, VIJAYA TIMES, VIJAYA KARNATAKA, TIMES NOW (24 hour news channel) and many more.

    Times Group is owned by Bennet & Coleman. Eighty per cent of funding is done by the World Christian Council. The balance of twenty per cent is equally shared by an Englishman and an Italian. The Italian Roberto Mindo is a close relative of Sonia Gandhi.

    STAR TV:
    Is run by an Australian who is supported by St. Peters Pontifical Church in Melbourne, Australia.

    HINDUSTAN TIMES:
    Owned by Birla Group, but hands have changed since Shobana Bhartiya took over. Presently it is working in collaboration with Times Group.

    THE HINDU:
    An English daily started over 125 years by a Sri Vaishnava Hindu family. It has been recently taken over by the Joshua Society in Berne, Switzerland. Edited by the Communist Sinophile N. Ram. He also edits the newspaper’s fortnightly Marxist magazine FRONTLINE. THE HINDU is known in Chennai (Madras) variously as “The Sapper” (because it supported the British during the struggle for Indian independence) and “The Old Widow of Mount Road” (because of its lugubrious, cliche-ridden style of writing and incomprehensible editorials). More recently it has aquired the title “China’s National Newspaper in India”.

    INDIAN EXPRESS:
    It is divided into two groups. THE INDIAN EXPRESS in North India and THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS in South India. Founded by the Hindu freedom fighter Ramnath Goenka. Controlled by Acts Ministries who has a major stake in the INDIAN EXPRESS. THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS is still with its North Indian counterpart.

    EENADU:
    To date this Hyderabad newspaper is still controlled by an Indian named Ramoji Rao. It is under concerted attack by the Christian Church, the Andhra Pradesh Christian chief minister Y.S. Rajashekhara Reddy and the Congress Party.

    ANDHRA JYOTHI:
    The Muslim Party of Hyderabad known as MIM along with a Congress minister has purchased this Telugu daily very recently.

    THE STATESMAN:
    It is controlled by Communist Party of India.

    KAIRAL TV:
    It is controlled by Communist Party of India (Marxist).

    MATHRABHOOMI:
    Leaders of the Muslim League and some Communist Party members have major investments in the newspaper.

    ASIAN AGE & DECCAN CHRONICLE:
    These popular newspapers are owned by a Saudi Arabian company. Its chief editor was M.J. Akbar until early 2008. New chief editor unknown. These papers are aggressively pro-Christian (Roman Catholic) anti-Hindu newspapers.

    DOORDARSHAN
    India’s national TV network broadcasting in all corners of the country. Since Sonia Gandhi’s Congress Party has come to power, all DOORDARSHAN stations carry Christian missionary programmes dubbed into the regional languages.

    Courtesy: Intellibriefs at link.

    —————————————————–

    THE USURPATION OF CONTROL OF THE INDIAN MEDIA HAS BEEN DONE BY THE AMERICANS
    By Gautam Sen

    India happens to be one of the very few major countries in the world whose dominant media is controlled directly or indirectly by foreigners. The usurpation of control has actually been by Americans, much of it through surrogates of evangelical organisations that are in fact quasi-government agencies. Paradoxically, Leftist Indian political parties supposedly hostile to a US presence in India have been subdued with alacrity by these quasi-state religious agencies, which have been operating effectively in other parts of the world as well. In Latin America, where liberation theology offered succour to the poor, the very same neo-fascist, American evangelical organisations, working in conjunction with the US State Department and intelligence services, ousted them. In India, most English language media outlets, are, in effect, vying with each other to accelerate the fragmentation of India in consonance with Anglo-American goals.

    Viceroys to India in the decade before independence, Linlithgow, Wavell and Mountbatten are destined to prove prescient about its innate fractiousness. The alleged oppression of minorities is the political bridgehead that modern evangelical organisations have entrenched in the public consciousness, relentlessly distorting its reality and using it ruthlessly to fuel discontent within India. By deliberately misrepresenting the Godhra communal riots as genocide, though both communities suffered, the media has gleefully incited Islamic terrorist attacks against Hindus and harsh international condemnation of India. As a corollary, the rise of the BJP inspired them to equate mundane nationalist aspirations with the oxymoron of Hindu extremism. Yet, there is resounding silence on the role of the minority community in providing succour to Islamic terrorism through vote bank politics and concealment from attention.

    Courtesy: India-Forum: News and Analysis at link

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 170 other followers

%d bloggers like this: